Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
JGRWvsLRNDETF Comparison
Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. JGRW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.57%, versus 0.15% for LRND. JGRW is down -4.59% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. LRND performs better with -3.11% YTD performance, and +$102M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JGRW and LRND below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
JGRW vs LRND performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JGRW LRND | -1.42%-2.30% | -4.27%-3.89% | -4.59%-3.11% | +0.92%+21.00% | n/a+92.12% | n/an/a |
| Flows | JGRW LRND | -+$54M | +$8M+$159M | +$2M+$102M | +$30M+$160M | -+$161M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JGRW LRND | +11.32%+15.14% | +15.66%+20.85% | n/a+17.15% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | JGRW LRND | -6.65%-5.64% | -10.43%-16.04% | n/a-20.97% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | JGRW LRND | 58d40d | 37d49d | n/a126d | n/an/a |
JGRW | LRND | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.61 | $39.38 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $25.76 | $39.42 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
JGRW | LRND | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
JGRW | LRND | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.61 | $39.38 |
| 1D performance | -0.60% | -0.10% |
| AuM | $119.18 M | $165.82 M |
| E/R | 0.57% | 0.15% |
JGRW | LRND | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Jensen Investment Management | New York Life Investments |
| Benchmark | - | NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders Index |
| N° of holdings | 26 | 93 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 12, 2024 | February 8, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the JGRW and LRND ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, JGRW is down -4.59% year-to-date (YTD), while LRND has lost -3.11%. That puts LRND better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JGRW or LRND?
Year-to-date, the JGRW ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$102M for LRND.
Which ETF is more volatile: JGRW or LRND?
Over the past year, JGRW had a volatility of 15.66%, while LRND experienced 20.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: JGRW or LRND?
As of March 10, 2026, JGRW holds $119.18 M in assets under management (AUM), while LRND manages $165.82 M.
What sectors do the JGRW and LRND ETFs invest in?
JGRW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. Meanwhile, LRND focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the JGRW ETF and LRND ETF?
JGRW top holdings include MICROSOFT-T, ALPHABET INC-CL and APPLE. LRND holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: JGRW or LRND?
JGRW holds 26 securities with 76.52% of its assets in the top 15. LRND has 95 securities and a top 15 weight of 75.02%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
