JANTvsGPIQETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF (JANT) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. JANT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.74%, versus 0.35% for GPIQ. JANT is up 10.75% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4M in YTD flows. GPIQ performs better with 12.12% YTD performance, and +$3.83B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JANT and GPIQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
JANT vs GPIQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JANT GPIQ | +0.89%-5.54% | +4.63%+0.99% | +10.75%+12.12% | +13.19%+11.83% | +66.70%+87.89% | +63.18%n/a |
| Flows | JANT GPIQ | -$7M+$640M | -$7M+$1.45B | -$4M+$3.83B | -$4M+$4.43B | -$3M+$6.24B | -$10M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JANT GPIQ | +5.49%+15.69% | +7.48%+17.60% | +9.39%+18.02% | +11.47%n/a |
| Max drawdown | JANT GPIQ | -1.25%-7.44% | -5.93%-9.57% | -13.02%-21.18% | -16.11%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | JANT GPIQ | 16d24d | 70d75d | 124d124d | 531dn/a |
JANT | GPIQ | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $54.29 | |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $56.07 | |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
JANT | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $54.29 |
| 1D performance | – | -3.17% |
| AuM | $55.91 M | $6.36 B |
| E/R | 0.74% | 0.35% |
JANT | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Allianz Investment Management LLC | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 31, 2020 | October 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
