Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IYCvsMILNETF Comparison
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) belongs to the US Cons. Discretionary segment. Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN) is part of the New Consumers & Focus segment. IYC's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Consumer Staples. In contrast, MILN's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Information Technology. IYC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.5% for MILN. IYC is down -4.83% year-to-date (YTD) with -$347M in YTD flows. MILN performs worse with -11.81% YTD performance, and -$6M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IYC and MILN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IYC vs MILN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IYC MILN | -3.34%-2.04% | -6.01%-11.75% | -4.83%-11.81% | +15.03%-0.98% | +66.11%+50.05% | +32.47%+0.66% |
| Flows | IYC MILN | -$183M-$7M | -$310M-$5M | -$347M-$6M | -$350M-$20M | +$73M-$48M | -$500M-$47M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IYC MILN | +13.43%+17.87% | +20.33%+22.55% | +17.47%+18.84% | +20.68%+23.21% |
| Max drawdown | IYC MILN | -8.48%-14.45% | -13.37%-18.18% | -21.64%-23.53% | -35.92%-44.40% |
| Max drawdown duration | IYC MILN | 59d61d | 37d173d | 212d175d | 1044d1097d |
IYC | MILN | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $98.12 | $41.34 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $98.33 | $41.36 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IYC | MILN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IYC | MILN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $98.12 | $41.34 |
| 1D performance | -0.21% | -0.03% |
| AuM | $1.19 B | $92.24 M |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.5% |
IYC | MILN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Global X |
| Benchmark | Russell 1000 Consumer Discretionary 40 Act 15/22.5 Daily Capped Index | Indxx Millenials Thematic Index |
| N° of holdings | 149 | 75 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 12, 2000 | May 4, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IYC and MILN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, IYC is down -4.83% year-to-date (YTD), while MILN has lost -11.81%. That puts IYC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IYC or MILN?
Year-to-date, the IYC ETF saw -$347M in flows, compared to -$6M for MILN.
Which ETF is more volatile: IYC or MILN?
Over the past year, IYC had a volatility of 20.33%, while MILN experienced 22.55%.
Which ETF is bigger: IYC or MILN?
As of March 13, 2026, IYC holds $1.19 B in assets under management (AUM), while MILN manages $92.24 M.
What sectors do the IYC and MILN ETFs invest in?
IYC leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Consumer Staples. Meanwhile, MILN focuses on Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the IYC ETF and MILN ETF?
IYC top holdings include AMAZON.COM INC, TESLA and WALMART INC. MILN holds in its top three: ALPHABET INC-CL, APPLE and CARVANA CO.
Which ETF is more diversified: IYC or MILN?
IYC holds 167 securities with 60.29% of its assets in the top 15. MILN has 79 securities and a top 15 weight of 50.47%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
