Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IXNvsTYLGETF Comparison
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) belongs to the Global Large Cap segment. Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Information Technology. IXN is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.64% for TYLG. IXN is up 1.01% year-to-date (YTD) with -$114M in YTD flows. TYLG performs worse with -0.73% YTD performance, and +$700K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IXN and TYLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IXN vs TYLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IXN TYLG | -1.84%-0.89% | -0.14%-1.35% | +1.01%-0.73% | +40.42%+27.47% | +120.23%+83.50% | +116.04%n/a |
| Flows | IXN TYLG | +$75M+$700K | -$69M+$700K | -$114M+$700K | +$294M+$34K | +$312M+$8M | -$1.69B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IXN TYLG | +23.37%+18.26% | +26.57%+23.12% | +23.00%+19.20% | +24.24%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IXN TYLG | -7.73%-7.50% | -17.88%-16.36% | -25.59%-23.70% | -36.14%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IXN TYLG | 42d42d | 45d45d | 124d140d | 688dn/a |
IXN | TYLG | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:36 PM | $105.12 | $35.44 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $106.23 | $35.26 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IXN | TYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IXN | TYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $105.12 | $35.44 |
| 1D performance | -1.04% | +0.50% |
| AuM | $6.56 B | $11.69 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.64% |
IXN | TYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Global X |
| Benchmark | S&P Global 1200 Information Technology 4.5/22.5/45 Capped Index | Cboe S&P Technology Select Sector Half BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 115 | 65 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 12, 2001 | November 21, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IXN and TYLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IXN is up 1.01% year-to-date (YTD), while TYLG has lost -0.73%. That puts IXN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IXN or TYLG?
Year-to-date, the IXN ETF saw -$114M in flows, compared to +$700K for TYLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: IXN or TYLG?
Over the past year, IXN had a volatility of 26.57%, while TYLG experienced 23.12%.
Which ETF is bigger: IXN or TYLG?
As of March 11, 2026, IXN holds $6.56 B in assets under management (AUM), while TYLG manages $11.69 M.
What sectors do the IXN and TYLG ETFs invest in?
IXN leans toward sectors like Information Technology. Meanwhile, TYLG focuses on Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the IXN ETF and TYLG ETF?
IXN top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. TYLG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: IXN or TYLG?
IXN holds 122 securities with 69.8% of its assets in the top 15. TYLG has 70 securities and a top 15 weight of 72.11%.
Tech ETFs Surge, Led by Nvidia’s Outstanding Performance
Tech Sinks in First Week of August
Global X launches new sector covered call ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
