Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWFvsVONGETF Comparison
The ETFs iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) track the Russell 1000 Growth Total Return Index - USD and belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. IWF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.06% for VONG. IWF is down -4.6% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3.40B in YTD flows. VONG performs better with -4.58% YTD performance, and +$4.68B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWF and VONG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWF vs VONG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWF VONG | -1.42%-1.42% | -5.65%-5.63% | -4.60%-4.58% | +24.77%+24.92% | +103.62%+104.25% | +92.00%+93.02% |
| Flows | IWF VONG | +$648M+$1.88B | -$2.01B+$5.13B | -$3.40B+$4.68B | -$1.57B+$9.71B | -$469M+$15.67B | -$1.22B+$20.88B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWF VONG | +15.76%+15.26% | +22.60%+22.51% | +19.04%+18.92% | +21.41%+21.45% |
| Max drawdown | IWF VONG | -7.14%-7.13% | -15.75%-15.76% | -23.36%-23.34% | -32.75%-32.70% |
| Max drawdown duration | IWF VONG | 76d76d | 45d45d | 191d191d | 743d729d |
IWF | VONG | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 3:26 PM | $444.66 | $114.43 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $451.32 | $116.17 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWF | VONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWF | VONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $444.66 | $114.43 |
| 1D performance | -1.48% | -1.50% |
| AuM | $116.99 B | $39.00 B |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.06% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWF and VONG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IWF is down -4.6% year-to-date (YTD), while VONG has lost -4.58%. That puts VONG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWF or VONG?
Year-to-date, the IWF ETF saw -$3.40B in flows, compared to +$4.68B for VONG.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWF or VONG?
Over the past year, IWF had a volatility of 22.6%, while VONG experienced 22.51%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWF or VONG?
As of March 11, 2026, IWF holds $116.99 B in assets under management (AUM), while VONG manages $39.00 B.
What sectors do the IWF and VONG ETFs invest in?
IWF leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, VONG focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the IWF ETF and VONG ETF?
IWF top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. VONG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWF or VONG?
IWF holds 391 securities with 66.22% of its assets in the top 15. VONG has 391 securities and a top 15 weight of 66.34%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
