Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWFvsPRXGETF Comparison
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF (PRXG) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. IWF's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. In contrast, PRXG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. IWF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.36% for PRXG. IWF is down -4.6% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3.40B in YTD flows. PRXG performs worse with -4.63% YTD performance, and +$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWF and PRXG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWF vs PRXG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWF PRXG | -1.42%-1.32% | -5.65%-5.54% | -4.60%-4.63% | +24.77%n/a | +103.62%n/a | +92.00%n/a |
| Flows | IWF PRXG | +$648M-$52K | -$2.01B+$7M | -$3.40B+$4M | -$1.57B- | -$469M- | -$1.22B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWF PRXG | +15.76%+15.60% | +22.60%n/a | +19.04%n/a | +21.41%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IWF PRXG | -7.14%-7.06% | -15.75%n/a | -23.36%n/a | -32.75%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWF PRXG | 76d73d | 45dn/a | 191dn/a | 743dn/a |
IWF | PRXG | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 6:40 PM | $444.42 | $34.35 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $451.32 | $34.81 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWF | PRXG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWF | PRXG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $444.42 | $34.35 |
| 1D performance | -1.53% | -1.32% |
| AuM | $116.99 B | $72.21 M |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.36% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWF and PRXG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IWF is down -4.6% year-to-date (YTD), while PRXG has lost -4.63%. That puts IWF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWF or PRXG?
Year-to-date, the IWF ETF saw -$3.40B in flows, compared to +$4M for PRXG.
Which ETF is bigger: IWF or PRXG?
As of March 11, 2026, IWF holds $116.99 B in assets under management (AUM), while PRXG manages $72.21 M.
What sectors do the IWF and PRXG ETFs invest in?
IWF leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, PRXG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the IWF ETF and PRXG ETF?
IWF top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. PRXG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWF or PRXG?
IWF holds 391 securities with 66.22% of its assets in the top 15. PRXG has 174 securities and a top 15 weight of 70.91%.
Praxis Launches Two Faith-Based Large Cap ETFs: PRXG and PRXV
Top 3 growth ETFs of 2022
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
