Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IVWvsQQHETF Comparison
HCM Defender 100 ETF
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) belongs to the US Large Cap Growth segment. HCM Defender 100 ETF (QQH) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. IVW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.98% for QQH. IVW is down -2.65% year-to-date (YTD) with -$368M in YTD flows. QQH performs worse with -2.9% YTD performance, and +$16M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IVW and QQH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IVW vs QQH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IVW QQH | -1.37%-0.96% | -3.45%-5.48% | -2.65%-2.90% | +29.82%+25.65% | +105.43%+110.01% | +92.29%+88.64% |
| Flows | IVW QQH | +$156M- | -$440M+$39M | -$368M+$16M | -$1.57B+$24M | +$5.51B+$133M | +$4.51B+$297M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IVW QQH | +16.40%+21.77% | +22.33%+22.75% | +18.63%+21.89% | +21.11%+22.11% |
| Max drawdown | IVW QQH | -6.09%-7.92% | -15.10%-13.04% | -22.23%-24.86% | -32.78%-41.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | IVW QQH | 42d41d | 45d49d | 124d238d | 794d878d |
IVW | QQH | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $117.91 | $73.41 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $119.93 | $75.08 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IVW | QQH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IVW | QQH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $117.91 | $73.41 |
| 1D performance | -1.68% | -2.23% |
| AuM | $64.45 B | $675.81 M |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.98% |
IVW | QQH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Howard Capital Management |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Growth Index | HCM Defender 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 132 | 84 |
| Asset class | Equities | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 22, 2000 | October 10, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IVW and QQH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IVW is down -2.65% year-to-date (YTD), while QQH has lost -2.9%. That puts IVW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IVW or QQH?
Year-to-date, the IVW ETF saw -$368M in flows, compared to +$16M for QQH.
Which ETF is more volatile: IVW or QQH?
Over the past year, IVW had a volatility of 22.33%, while QQH experienced 22.75%.
Which ETF is bigger: IVW or QQH?
As of March 11, 2026, IVW holds $64.45 B in assets under management (AUM), while QQH manages $675.81 M.
What sectors do the IVW and QQH ETFs invest in?
IVW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QQH focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the IVW ETF and QQH ETF?
IVW top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL. QQH holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: IVW or QQH?
IVW holds 140 securities with 69.25% of its assets in the top 15. QQH has 88 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.27%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
