ISWNvsCSHIETF Comparison
VS
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International) (ISWN) and NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. ISWN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.38% for CSHI. ISWN is up 0.24% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. CSHI performs better with 3.83% YTD performance, and +$1.23B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ISWN and CSHI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ISWN vs CSHI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ISWN CSHI | -1.75%+0.36% | -4.05%+1.06% | +0.24%+3.83% | +0.76%+4.97% | +31.79%+16.74% | -4.65%n/a |
| Flows | ISWN CSHI | -+$186M | -+$570M | +$2M+$1.23B | +$2M+$1.36B | -$10M+$1.84B | +$2M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ISWN CSHI | +11.85%+0.23% | +12.88%+0.53% | +12.59%+1.10% | +12.46%n/a |
| Max drawdown | ISWN CSHI | -8.27%n/a | -9.54%-0.18% | -13.40%-1.52% | -31.97%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ISWN CSHI | 64dn/a | 229d6d | 243d20d | 1570dn/a |
Trading data
ISWN | CSHI | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $21.04 | $49.59 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $21.03 | $49.60 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 18, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CSHI
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexISWN | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ISWN | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $21.04 | $49.59 |
| 1D performance | +0.03% | -0.02% |
| AuM | $34.69 M | $2.03 B |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
ISWN | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Amplify ETFs | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | S-Network International BlackSwan Index | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Alternative | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 26, 2021 | August 30, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ISWN
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
ISWN
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
ISWN
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
ISWN
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about ISWN and CSHI
How have the ISWN and CSHI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, ISWN is up 0.24% year-to-date (YTD), while CSHI has returned 3.83%. That puts CSHI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ISWN or CSHI?
Year-to-date, the ISWN ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$1.23B for CSHI.
Which ETF is more volatile: ISWN or CSHI?
Over the past year, ISWN had a volatility of 12.88%, while CSHI experienced 0.53%.
Which ETF is bigger: ISWN or CSHI?
As of October 16, 2026, ISWN holds $34.69 M in assets under management (AUM), while CSHI manages $2.03 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about ISWN & CSHI
Advertisement
Advertisement
