ISTMvsCGWETF Comparison
iShares Strategic Metals ETF (ISTM) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. In contrast, CGW's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. ISTM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.59% for CGW. ISTM is down -0.53% year-to-date (YTD) with +$16M in YTD flows. CGW performs better with 1.79% YTD performance, and +$41M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ISTM and CGW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ISTM vs CGW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ISTM CGW | -5.74%+2.50% | -2.45%-0.85% | -0.53%+1.79% | +15.84%+1.21% | +69.72%+50.46% | n/a+18.26% |
| Flows | ISTM CGW | -$6M-$358K | -$3M-$358K | +$16M+$41M | +$16M+$46M | +$16M-$126M | --$205M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ISTM CGW | +19.17%+12.44% | +32.79%+13.37% | +24.61%+13.67% | n/a+15.78% |
| Max drawdown | ISTM CGW | -11.68%-7.04% | -21.02%-10.52% | -21.02%-14.42% | n/a-32.65% |
| Max drawdown duration | ISTM CGW | 50d85d | 273d245d | 273d227d | n/a862d |
ISTM | CGW | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.49 | $64.06 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $28.22 | $63.88 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ISTM | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ISTM | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.49 | $64.06 |
| 1D performance | -2.59% | +0.28% |
| AuM | $25.42 M | $1.04 B |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.59% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
