IPACvsNBJPETF Comparison
VS
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) belongs to the DM Blended Cap segment. Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF (NBJP) is part of the Japan Blended Cap segment. IPAC's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, NBJP's top sector exposures are Industrials, Finance and Technology. IPAC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.09%, versus 1.92% for NBJP. IPAC is up 18.24% year-to-date (YTD) with +$245M in YTD flows. NBJP performs worse with 16.12% YTD performance, and +$58M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IPAC and NBJP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IPAC vs NBJP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IPAC NBJP | +2.57%+0.69% | +3.79%-1.19% | +18.24%+16.12% | +24.00%+23.85% | +66.18%n/a | +49.85%n/a |
| Flows | IPAC NBJP | +$51M- | +$134M-$22M | +$245M+$58M | +$526M+$75M | +$264M- | +$950M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IPAC NBJP | +19.36%+25.83% | +17.95%+23.16% | +16.93%n/a | +16.72%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IPAC NBJP | -4.64%-11.88% | -11.30%-14.65% | -15.72%n/a | -29.73%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IPAC NBJP | 9d72d | 121d71d | 225dn/a | 1030dn/a |
Trading data
IPAC | NBJP | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 2:56 PM | $86.67 | $36.30 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $85.64 | $35.66 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NBJP
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexIPAC | NBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/3/2026 at 2:56 PM
Live
Closed
IPAC | NBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $86.67 | $36.30 |
| 1D performance | +1.20% | +1.80% |
| AuM | $2.80 B | $124.97 M |
| E/R | 0.09% | 1.92% |
Characteristics
IPAC | NBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Neuberger Berman |
| Benchmark | MSCI Pacific IMI Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 1366 | 58 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 10, 2014 | September 12, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IPAC
Japan
68.93%
Australia
19.63%
Other
11.43%
NBJP
Japan
96.51%
Other
3.49%
Sectors
IPAC
Finance
29.58%
Industrials
15.2%
Technology
14.97%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.62%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.16%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.59%
Other
14.89%
NBJP
Industrials
25.89%
Finance
24.24%
Technology
14.76%
Consumer Cyclical.
14.05%
Other
21.06%
Advertisement
Diversification
IPAC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
23.98%
NBJP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
46.77%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
IPAC
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
2.57%
BHP Group Ltd.
2.29%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
2.27%
Toyota Motor Corp.
2.02%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
1.65%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.59%
Hitachi Ltd.
1.59%
Sony Group Corp.
1.52%
Advantest Corp.
1.40%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
1.31%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
1.26%
SoftBank Group Corp.
1.17%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.17%
AIA Group Ltd.
1.16%
Fast Retailing Co., Ltd.
1.02%
NBJP
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
5.02%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
4.88%
Sysmex Corp.
4.28%
Resona Holdings, Inc.
3.93%
Toyota Motor Corp.
3.76%
Niterra Co., Ltd.
3.42%
AMADA Co., Ltd.
2.87%
Sumitomo Realty & Development Co., Ltd.
2.59%
Kinden Corp.
2.56%
FANUC Corp.
2.52%
Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd.
2.35%
USS Co., Ltd.
2.28%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.17%
Daiei Kankyo Co. Ltd.
2.09%
Toyota Tsusho Corp.
2.05%
Frequently asked questions about IPAC and NBJP
How have the IPAC and NBJP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, IPAC is up 18.24% year-to-date (YTD), while NBJP has returned 16.12%. That puts IPAC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IPAC or NBJP?
Year-to-date, the IPAC ETF saw +$245M in flows, compared to +$58M for NBJP.
Which ETF is more volatile: IPAC or NBJP?
Over the past year, IPAC had a volatility of 17.95%, while NBJP experienced 23.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: IPAC or NBJP?
As of September 2, 2026, IPAC holds $2.80 B in assets under management (AUM), while NBJP manages $124.97 M.
What sectors do the IPAC and NBJP ETFs invest in?
IPAC leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, NBJP focuses on Industrials, Finance and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the IPAC ETF and NBJP ETF?
IPAC top holdings include Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., BHP Group Ltd. and Commonwealth Bank of Australia. NBJP holds in its top three: Mizuho Financial Group, Inc., Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc. and Sysmex Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: IPAC or NBJP?
IPAC holds 1368 securities with 23.98% of its assets in the top 15. NBJP has 58 securities and a top 15 weight of 46.77%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IPAC & NBJP
Advertisement
