Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IMTMvsFEDMETF Comparison
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. IMTM's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, FEDM's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. IMTM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.14% for FEDM. IMTM is down -0.71% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2M in YTD flows. FEDM performs better with 0.57% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IMTM and FEDM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IMTM vs FEDM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IMTM FEDM | -7.84%-5.47% | +0.05%+1.62% | -0.71%+0.57% | +26.17%+20.73% | +69.03%+49.12% | +52.99%n/a |
| Flows | IMTM FEDM | +$45M- | +$69M+$2M | -$2M+$2M | +$599M+$16M | +$1.71B+$25M | +$2.04B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IMTM FEDM | +18.78%+13.59% | +17.43%+15.00% | +15.57%+13.17% | +16.81%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IMTM FEDM | -10.19%-7.61% | -12.14%-12.85% | -12.14%-14.86% | -30.65%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IMTM FEDM | 16d10d | 35d38d | 35d214d | 829dn/a |
IMTM | FEDM | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.65 | $58.31 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $48.48 | $58.74 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IMTM | FEDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IMTM | FEDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.65 | $58.31 |
| 1D performance | -1.71% | -0.73% |
| AuM | $3.52 B | $76.19 M |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.14% |
IMTM | FEDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | FlexShares |
| Benchmark | MSCI World ex USA Momentum Index | Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index |
| N° of holdings | 282 | 211 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 13, 2015 | September 21, 2021 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IMTM and FEDM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, IMTM is down -0.71% year-to-date (YTD), while FEDM has returned 0.57%. That puts FEDM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IMTM or FEDM?
Year-to-date, the IMTM ETF saw -$2M in flows, compared to +$2M for FEDM.
Which ETF is more volatile: IMTM or FEDM?
Over the past year, IMTM had a volatility of 17.43%, while FEDM experienced 15%.
Which ETF is bigger: IMTM or FEDM?
As of March 13, 2026, IMTM holds $3.52 B in assets under management (AUM), while FEDM manages $76.19 M.
What sectors do the IMTM and FEDM ETFs invest in?
IMTM leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, FEDM focuses on Financials, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the IMTM ETF and FEDM ETF?
IMTM top holdings include HSBC HOLDINGS, BANCO SANTANDER SA and ASML HOLDING. FEDM holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROYAL BK CANADA and SIEMENS.
Which ETF is more diversified: IMTM or FEDM?
IMTM holds 300 securities with 26.94% of its assets in the top 15. FEDM has 220 securities and a top 15 weight of 21.78%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.