ILSvsSMBETF Comparison
VS
Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) belongs to the Intl HY Bonds segment. VanEck Short Muni ETF (SMB) is part of the Municipal Bonds segment. ILS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Sovereign. In contrast, SMB's top sector exposures are Municipal. ILS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.58%, versus 0.07% for SMB. ILS is up 5.98% year-to-date (YTD) with +$63M in YTD flows. SMB performs worse with 0.73% YTD performance, and +$24M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ILS and SMB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ILS vs SMB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/07/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ILS SMB | +1.74%-0.18% | +3.71%-0.02% | +5.98%+0.73% | +8.79%+1.24% | n/a+9.79% | n/a+5.62% |
| Flows | ILS SMB | +$13M+$4M | +$20M+$15M | +$63M+$24M | +$86M+$35M | -+$58M | -+$18M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ILS SMB | +1.22%+0.98% | +0.95%+0.97% | n/a+1.33% | n/a+1.46% |
| Max drawdown | ILS SMB | -0.02%-0.65% | -0.17%-1.33% | n/a-1.62% | n/a-6.68% |
| Max drawdown duration | ILS SMB | 2d64d | 8d191d | n/a58d | n/a1045d |
Trading data
ILS | SMB | |
Last sale 9/9/2026 at 1:30 PM | $20.34 | $17.10 |
| Previous close 09/08/2026 | $20.35 | $17.14 |
| Consolidated volume 09/08/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 10, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ILS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexILS | SMB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/9/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ILS | SMB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $20.34 | $17.10 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | -0.23% |
| AuM | $99.37 M | $316.67 M |
| E/R | 1.58% | 0.07% |
Characteristics
ILS | SMB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Brookmont Capital Management | VanEck |
| Benchmark | - | ICE Short AMT-Free Broad National Municipal Index |
| N° of holdings | 101 | 233 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 31, 2025 | February 22, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ILS
USA
68.09%
Other
31.91%
SMB
USA
71.89%
Other
28.11%
Sectors
ILS
Finance
52.21%
Industrials
19.44%
Other
28.35%
SMB
Municipal
71.89%
Other
28.11%
Advertisement
Diversification
ILS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.37%
SMB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
13.26%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
ILS
USA, Bills 0% 29sep2026, USD (119D)
4.26%
Floodsmart Re, FRN 12mar2027, USD (2024-1, A)
2.84%
2001 Cat Re, FRN 8jan2031, USD (2023-1)
2.65%
US45870GAF37
1.90%
Atlas Capital, FRN 7jun2028, USD (1)
1.87%
Buttonwood Re, FRN 29may2029, USD (2026-1, A)
1.85%
Beazley, FRN 6apr2032, USD (Fuchsia 2023-1)
1.61%
Yosemite Re, FRN 7jun2028, USD (2025-1, A)
1.59%
US092168AB93
1.58%
Logistics Re, FRN 21dec2027, USD (2024-1)
1.56%
US574591AA15
1.56%
Montoya Re, FRN 7apr2028, USD (B)
1.55%
Four Lakes Re, FRN 7jan2027, USD (2023-1, B)
1.53%
US45870GAH92
1.52%
Sanders Re III, FRN 7apr2028, USD (2024-1, A)
1.49%
SMB
US64972LAF04
1.05%
US45506EMV29
1.03%
California, 5% 1apr2030, USD
1.03%
US160853VD67
1.03%
Southeast Energy Authority, 4% 1dec2051, USD
0.95%
Massachusetts, 5% 1may2031, USD
0.91%
US48542AFE64
0.90%
New Jersey, 2% 1jun2030, USD (2021)
0.89%
US64972KKJ33
0.84%
Massachusetts, 5% 1oct2031, USD (2022)
0.79%
US13078HAY80
0.79%
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, 5.25% 1aug2030, USD
0.78%
US56035DGT37
0.76%
Main Street Natural Gas Inc., 5% 1apr2054, USD (2024D)
0.75%
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., 5% 1may2052, USD (2020A)
0.75%
Frequently asked questions about ILS and SMB
How have the ILS and SMB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 7, 2026, ILS is up 5.98% year-to-date (YTD), while SMB has returned 0.73%. That puts ILS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ILS or SMB?
Year-to-date, the ILS ETF saw +$63M in flows, compared to +$24M for SMB.
Which ETF is more volatile: ILS or SMB?
Over the past year, ILS had a volatility of 0.95%, while SMB experienced 0.97%.
Which ETF is bigger: ILS or SMB?
As of September 7, 2026, ILS holds $99.37 M in assets under management (AUM), while SMB manages $316.67 M.
What sectors do the ILS and SMB ETFs invest in?
ILS leans toward sectors like Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, SMB focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the ILS ETF and SMB ETF?
ILS top holdings include USA, Bills 0% 29sep2026, USD (119D), Floodsmart Re, FRN 12mar2027, USD (2024-1, A) and 2001 Cat Re, FRN 8jan2031, USD (2023-1). SMB holds in its top three: US64972LAF04, US45506EMV29 and California, 5% 1apr2030, USD.
Which ETF is more diversified: ILS or SMB?
ILS holds 128 securities with 29.37% of its assets in the top 15. SMB has 329 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.26%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ILS & SMB
The ETF Underdogs, Part 10: Tail-Risk Selling Strategies
July 15, 2026
ILS
The Super El Niño Trade: Two Potential ETF Winners and Losers
June 10, 2026
ILS
Advertisement
Advertisement
