ILSvsFLCBETF Comparison
VS
Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) belongs to the Intl HY Bonds segment. Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB) is part of the US Corporate IG Bonds segment. ILS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Sovereign. In contrast, FLCB's top sector exposures are Sovereign, Finance and Industrials. ILS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.58%, versus 0.15% for FLCB. ILS is up 5.98% year-to-date (YTD) with +$63M in YTD flows. FLCB performs worse with -2.46% YTD performance, and +$384M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ILS and FLCB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ILS vs FLCB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/07/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ILS FLCB | +1.74%-0.36% | +3.71%-1.26% | +5.98%-2.46% | +8.79%-2.77% | n/a+8.87% | n/a-9.27% |
| Flows | ILS FLCB | +$13M+$47M | +$20M+$198M | +$63M+$384M | +$86M+$468M | -+$1.51B | -+$1.80B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ILS FLCB | +1.22%+4.19% | +0.95%+3.81% | n/a+5.12% | n/a+5.79% |
| Max drawdown | ILS FLCB | -0.02%-2.67% | -0.17%-4.44% | n/a-4.81% | n/a-20.67% |
| Max drawdown duration | ILS FLCB | 2d71d | 8d191d | n/a284d | n/a1820d |
Trading data
ILS | FLCB | |
Last sale 9/9/2026 at 1:30 PM | $20.34 | $20.89 |
| Previous close 09/08/2026 | $20.35 | $20.95 |
| Consolidated volume 09/08/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/9/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ILS | FLCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $20.34 | $20.89 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | -0.29% |
| AuM | $99.37 M | $3.07 B |
| E/R | 1.58% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
ILS | FLCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Brookmont Capital Management | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 101 | 842 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 31, 2025 | September 17, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ILS
USA
68.09%
Other
31.91%
FLCB
USA
58.73%
Other
41.27%
Sectors
ILS
Finance
52.21%
Industrials
19.44%
Other
28.35%
FLCB
Sovereign
26.14%
Finance
10.54%
Industrials
8.67%
Other
54.65%
Advertisement
Diversification
ILS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.37%
FLCB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.89%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
ILS
USA, Bills 0% 29sep2026, USD (119D)
4.26%
Floodsmart Re, FRN 12mar2027, USD (2024-1, A)
2.84%
2001 Cat Re, FRN 8jan2031, USD (2023-1)
2.65%
US45870GAF37
1.90%
Atlas Capital, FRN 7jun2028, USD (1)
1.87%
Buttonwood Re, FRN 29may2029, USD (2026-1, A)
1.85%
Beazley, FRN 6apr2032, USD (Fuchsia 2023-1)
1.61%
Yosemite Re, FRN 7jun2028, USD (2025-1, A)
1.59%
US092168AB93
1.58%
Logistics Re, FRN 21dec2027, USD (2024-1)
1.56%
US574591AA15
1.56%
Montoya Re, FRN 7apr2028, USD (B)
1.55%
Four Lakes Re, FRN 7jan2027, USD (2023-1, B)
1.53%
US45870GAH92
1.52%
Sanders Re III, FRN 7apr2028, USD (2024-1, A)
1.49%
FLCB
USA, Notes 3.25% 30jun2027, USD (AA-2027)
2.83%
USA, Notes 4.125% 30apr2033, USD (K-2033)
2.52%
USA, Notes 1.375% 31dec2028, USD (T-2028)
1.82%
USA, Notes 4.125% 31jul2028, USD (AB-2028)
1.75%
USA, Bonds 1.375% 15aug2050, USD
1.14%
USA, Notes 4% 31oct2029, USD (R-2029)
1.07%
USA, Notes 3.5% 30apr2028, USD (Y-2028)
1.05%
USA, Bonds 4.75% 15aug2055, USD
1.02%
USA, Notes 0.5% 30jun2027, USD (M-2027)
0.97%
USA, Notes 1.25% 31may2028, USD (L-2028)
0.84%
USA, Bonds 3% 15nov2044, USD
0.82%
USA, Bonds 2% 15nov2041, USD
0.81%
USA, Bonds 3% 15feb2049, USD
0.81%
USA, Bonds 1.25% 15may2050, USD
0.72%
USA, Notes 4.125% 31aug2030, USD (P-2030)
0.71%
Frequently asked questions about ILS and FLCB
How have the ILS and FLCB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 7, 2026, ILS is up 5.98% year-to-date (YTD), while FLCB has lost -2.46%. That puts ILS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ILS or FLCB?
Year-to-date, the ILS ETF saw +$63M in flows, compared to +$384M for FLCB.
Which ETF is more volatile: ILS or FLCB?
Over the past year, ILS had a volatility of 0.95%, while FLCB experienced 3.81%.
Which ETF is bigger: ILS or FLCB?
As of September 7, 2026, ILS holds $99.37 M in assets under management (AUM), while FLCB manages $3.07 B.
What sectors do the ILS and FLCB ETFs invest in?
ILS leans toward sectors like Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, FLCB focuses on Sovereign, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ILS ETF and FLCB ETF?
ILS top holdings include USA, Bills 0% 29sep2026, USD (119D), Floodsmart Re, FRN 12mar2027, USD (2024-1, A) and 2001 Cat Re, FRN 8jan2031, USD (2023-1). FLCB holds in its top three: USA, Notes 3.25% 30jun2027, USD (AA-2027), USA, Notes 4.125% 30apr2033, USD (K-2033) and USA, Notes 1.375% 31dec2028, USD (T-2028).
Which ETF is more diversified: ILS or FLCB?
ILS holds 128 securities with 29.37% of its assets in the top 15. FLCB has 1008 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.89%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ILS & FLCB
The ETF Underdogs, Part 10: Tail-Risk Selling Strategies
July 15, 2026
ILS
The Super El Niño Trade: Two Potential ETF Winners and Losers
June 10, 2026
ILS
Advertisement
Advertisement
