ILSvsBDBTETF Comparison
VS
Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) belongs to the Intl HY Bonds segment. Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT) is part of the US Aggregate Bonds segment. ILS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Sovereign. In contrast, BDBT's top sector exposures are Sovereign, Finance and Industrials. ILS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.58%, versus 0.27% for BDBT. ILS is up 5.98% year-to-date (YTD) with +$63M in YTD flows. BDBT performs worse with -0.51% YTD performance, and +$94M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ILS and BDBT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ILS vs BDBT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/07/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ILS BDBT | +1.74%-0.38% | +3.71%-0.24% | +5.98%-0.51% | +8.79%+0.16% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | ILS BDBT | +$13M+$5M | +$20M+$25M | +$63M+$94M | +$86M+$163M | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ILS BDBT | +1.22%+3.99% | +0.95%+3.70% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | ILS BDBT | -0.02%-1.74% | -0.17%-2.81% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ILS BDBT | 2d70d | 8d190d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
ILS | BDBT | |
Last sale 9/8/2026 at 1:30 PM | $20.35 | $24.69 |
| Previous close 09/04/2026 | $20.27 | $24.72 |
| Consolidated volume 09/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/8/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ILS | BDBT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $20.35 | $24.69 |
| 1D performance | +0.39% | -0.10% |
| AuM | $99.37 M | $485.50 M |
| E/R | 1.58% | 0.27% |
Characteristics
ILS | BDBT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Brookmont Capital Management | Bluemonte Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 101 | 11352 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 31, 2025 | June 23, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ILS
USA
68.09%
Other
31.91%
BDBT
USA
77.25%
Other
22.75%
Sectors
ILS
Finance
52.21%
Industrials
19.44%
Other
28.35%
BDBT
Sovereign
46.72%
Finance
10.33%
Industrials
7.05%
Other
35.9%
Advertisement
Diversification
ILS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.37%
BDBT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
10.84%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
ILS
USA, Bills 0% 29sep2026, USD (119D)
4.26%
Floodsmart Re, FRN 12mar2027, USD (2024-1, A)
2.84%
2001 Cat Re, FRN 8jan2031, USD (2023-1)
2.65%
US45870GAF37
1.90%
Atlas Capital, FRN 7jun2028, USD (1)
1.87%
Buttonwood Re, FRN 29may2029, USD (2026-1, A)
1.85%
Beazley, FRN 6apr2032, USD (Fuchsia 2023-1)
1.61%
Yosemite Re, FRN 7jun2028, USD (2025-1, A)
1.59%
US092168AB93
1.58%
Logistics Re, FRN 21dec2027, USD (2024-1)
1.56%
US574591AA15
1.56%
Montoya Re, FRN 7apr2028, USD (B)
1.55%
Four Lakes Re, FRN 7jan2027, USD (2023-1, B)
1.53%
US45870GAH92
1.52%
Sanders Re III, FRN 7apr2028, USD (2024-1, A)
1.49%
BDBT
BlackRock Cash Funds - Institutional
2.33%
USA, Notes 4.625% 15feb2035, USD (B-2035)
0.65%
USA, Notes 4.375% 15may2034, USD (C-2034)
0.64%
USA, Notes 4.25% 15nov2034, USD (F-2034)
0.63%
USA, Notes 4.25% 15aug2035, USD (E-2035)
0.63%
USA, Notes 4.25% 15may2035, USD (C-2035)
0.63%
USA, Notes 4.125% 15feb2036, USD (B-2036)
0.62%
USA, Notes 3.875% 15aug2034, USD (E-2034)
0.62%
USA, Notes 4% 15feb2034, USD (B-2034)
0.62%
USA, Notes 4.5% 15nov2033, USD (F-2033)
0.62%
USA, Notes 4% 15nov2035, USD (F-2035)
0.61%
USA, Notes 3.625% 31aug2029, USD (AC-2029)
0.60%
USA, Notes 4% 28feb2030, USD (H-2030)
0.58%
USA, Notes 3.875% 15aug2033, USD (E-2033)
0.55%
USA, Notes 2.875% 15may2032, USD (C-2032)
0.51%
Frequently asked questions about ILS and BDBT
How have the ILS and BDBT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 7, 2026, ILS is up 5.98% year-to-date (YTD), while BDBT has lost -0.51%. That puts ILS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ILS or BDBT?
Year-to-date, the ILS ETF saw +$63M in flows, compared to +$94M for BDBT.
Which ETF is more volatile: ILS or BDBT?
Over the past year, ILS had a volatility of 0.95%, while BDBT experienced 3.7%.
Which ETF is bigger: ILS or BDBT?
As of September 7, 2026, ILS holds $99.37 M in assets under management (AUM), while BDBT manages $485.50 M.
What sectors do the ILS and BDBT ETFs invest in?
ILS leans toward sectors like Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, BDBT focuses on Sovereign, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ILS ETF and BDBT ETF?
ILS top holdings include USA, Bills 0% 29sep2026, USD (119D), Floodsmart Re, FRN 12mar2027, USD (2024-1, A) and 2001 Cat Re, FRN 8jan2031, USD (2023-1). BDBT holds in its top three: BlackRock Cash Funds - Institutional, USA, Notes 4.625% 15feb2035, USD (B-2035) and USA, Notes 4.375% 15may2034, USD (C-2034).
Which ETF is more diversified: ILS or BDBT?
ILS holds 128 securities with 29.37% of its assets in the top 15. BDBT has 20859 securities and a top 15 weight of 10.84%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ILS & BDBT
The ETF Underdogs, Part 10: Tail-Risk Selling Strategies
July 15, 2026
ILS
The Super El Niño Trade: Two Potential ETF Winners and Losers
June 10, 2026
ILS
Advertisement
Advertisement
