ILITvsNLRETF Comparison
VS
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF (ILIT) and VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. ILIT's top 2 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials and Non-Corporate. In contrast, NLR's top sector exposures are Energy, Utilities and Industrials. ILIT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.52% for NLR. ILIT is down -33.43% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. NLR performs better with -26.93% YTD performance, and +$768M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ILIT and NLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ILIT vs NLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ILIT NLR | -24.11%-16.88% | -25.70%-19.05% | -33.43%-26.93% | -18.36%-35.41% | -27.86%+44.05% | n/a+78.93% |
| Flows | ILIT NLR | --$84M | --$221M | +$2M+$768M | +$4M+$1.13B | +$11M+$3.85B | -+$3.92B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ILIT NLR | +30.75%+37.31% | +41.62%+38.67% | +38.65%+33.05% | n/a+28.09% |
| Max drawdown | ILIT NLR | -34.95%-27.90% | -55.93%-44.30% | -59.66%-44.30% | n/a-44.30% |
| Max drawdown duration | ILIT NLR | 60d57d | 170d268d | 725d268d | n/a268d |
Trading data
ILIT | NLR | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $10.32 | $90.38 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $10.35 | $90.84 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ILIT | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ILIT | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $10.32 | $90.38 |
| 1D performance | -0.31% | -0.51% |
| AuM | $10.33 M | $3.05 B |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.52% |
Characteristics
ILIT | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | VanEck |
| Benchmark | STOXX Global Lithium Miners and Producers Index | MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index |
| N° of holdings | 35 | 25 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 23, 2023 | August 13, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
ILIT
China
36.06%
Australia
24.35%
USA
10.04%
Chile
9.26%
Other
20.29%
NLR
USA
48.42%
Canada
19.33%
Australia
8.86%
Other
23.38%
Sectors
ILIT
Non-Energy Materi.
99.89%
Other
0.11%
NLR
Energy
42.29%
Utilities
28.82%
Industrials
23.77%
Other
5.12%
Advertisement
Diversification
ILIT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
76.13%
NLR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
81.93%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
ILIT
Mineral Resources Ltd.
9.59%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
9.26%
PLS Group Ltd.
8.79%
Albemarle Corp.
8.00%
Liontown Ltd.
5.97%
Sigma Lithium Corp.
4.41%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
4.06%
Lithium Argentina AG
4.00%
Cosmo AM&T Co., Ltd.
3.94%
Lithium Americas Corp.
3.72%
Guangzhou Tinci Materials Technology Co., Ltd.
3.47%
Tianqi Lithium Corp.
3.44%
Critical Metals Corp.
2.53%
Suzhou Canmax Technologies Ltd.
2.50%
Hunan Yuneng New Energy Battery Material Co., Ltd.
2.45%
NLR
Constellation Energy Corp.
8.67%
Cameco Corp.
7.99%
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.
6.18%
Fortum Oyj
5.79%
Uranium Energy Corp.
5.62%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
5.39%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
5.32%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
5.15%
Centrus Energy Corp.
5.12%
Denison Mines Corp.
5.11%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
4.57%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.56%
CGN Power Co., Ltd.
4.30%
NuScale Power Corp.
4.27%
Oklo, Inc.
3.88%
Frequently asked questions about ILIT and NLR
How have the ILIT and NLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, ILIT is down -33.43% year-to-date (YTD), while NLR has lost -26.93%. That puts NLR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ILIT or NLR?
Year-to-date, the ILIT ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$768M for NLR.
Which ETF is more volatile: ILIT or NLR?
Over the past year, ILIT had a volatility of 41.62%, while NLR experienced 38.67%.
Which ETF is bigger: ILIT or NLR?
As of October 23, 2026, ILIT holds $10.33 M in assets under management (AUM), while NLR manages $3.05 B.
What sectors do the ILIT and NLR ETFs invest in?
ILIT leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, NLR focuses on Energy, Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ILIT ETF and NLR ETF?
ILIT top holdings include Mineral Resources Ltd., Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA and PLS Group Ltd.. NLR holds in its top three: Constellation Energy Corp., Cameco Corp. and Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ILIT or NLR?
ILIT holds 35 securities with 76.13% of its assets in the top 15. NLR has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 81.93%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ILIT & NLR
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
NLR
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
February 4, 2025
NLR
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
NLR
Advertisement
The Worst Performing ETFs of 2024
January 8, 2025
ILIT
The Worst Performing ETFs of 2024
January 8, 2025
ILIT
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
NLR
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
NLR
Advertisement
