Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IJSvsFYTETF Comparison
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund ETF (FYT) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap Value. IJS's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. In contrast, FYT's top sector exposures are Financials, Consumer Discretionary and Energy. IJS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.7% for FYT. IJS is up 3.77% year-to-date (YTD) with +$299M in YTD flows. FYT performs better with 7.96% YTD performance, and -$7M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IJS and FYT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IJS vs FYT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IJS FYT | -6.57%-4.32% | +1.36%+5.08% | +3.77%+7.96% | +21.13%+22.43% | +32.39%+39.28% | +21.47%+26.66% |
| Flows | IJS FYT | -$12M- | +$323M-$1M | +$299M-$7M | -$664M-$24M | -$1.62B-$89M | -$1.96B-$62M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IJS FYT | +17.68%+17.36% | +23.97%+24.59% | +21.88%+22.56% | +22.33%+23.11% |
| Max drawdown | IJS FYT | -6.66%-5.26% | -17.10%-16.24% | -28.57%-28.93% | -28.57%-28.93% |
| Max drawdown duration | IJS FYT | 30d16d | 98d98d | 379d409d | 379d409d |
IJS | FYT | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $118.00 | $60.90 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $118.08 | $61.22 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IJS | FYT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IJS | FYT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $118.00 | $60.90 |
| 1D performance | -0.07% | -0.52% |
| AuM | $7.27 B | $153.09 M |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.7% |
IJS | FYT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | First Trust |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index | NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 428 | 244 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 24, 2000 | April 19, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IJS and FYT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, IJS is up 3.77% year-to-date (YTD), while FYT has returned 7.96%. That puts FYT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IJS or FYT?
Year-to-date, the IJS ETF saw +$299M in flows, compared to -$7M for FYT.
Which ETF is more volatile: IJS or FYT?
Over the past year, IJS had a volatility of 23.97%, while FYT experienced 24.59%.
Which ETF is bigger: IJS or FYT?
As of March 10, 2026, IJS holds $7.27 B in assets under management (AUM), while FYT manages $153.09 M.
What sectors do the IJS and FYT ETFs invest in?
IJS leans toward sectors like Financials, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. Meanwhile, FYT focuses on Financials, Consumer Discretionary and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the IJS ETF and FYT ETF?
IJS top holdings include US0669224778, LKQ and JACKSON FINANCIAL INC. FYT holds in its top three: KOSMOS ENERGY, LIBERTY OILFIELD SERVICES and MATSON.
Which ETF is more diversified: IJS or FYT?
IJS holds 461 securities with 12.15% of its assets in the top 15. FYT has 258 securities and a top 15 weight of 10.85%.
Will 2024 be the Year of Small Caps and Value Stocks?
Value ETFs Shine Amid Lower-Than-Expected Inflation
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
