Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IGVvsGXPTETF Comparison
Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) is part of the US Info. Technology segment. IGV's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Industrials. In contrast, GXPT's top sector exposures are Information Technology, IGV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.25% for GXPT. IGV is down -18.89% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3.44B in YTD flows. GXPT performs better with -4.15% YTD performance, and +$38M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IGV and GXPT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IGV vs GXPT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IGV GXPT | +3.16%-2.07% | -21.93%-6.34% | -18.89%-4.15% | -4.24%n/a | +56.49%n/a | +22.74%n/a |
| Flows | IGV GXPT | +$2.36B+$23M | +$3.08B+$43M | +$3.44B+$38M | -$561M- | +$2.04B- | +$2.40B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IGV GXPT | +33.00%+22.03% | +29.04%n/a | +24.12%n/a | +27.17%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IGV GXPT | -29.92%-9.36% | -34.66%n/a | -34.66%n/a | -45.85%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IGV GXPT | 90d90d | 170dn/a | 170dn/a | 1049dn/a |
IGV | GXPT | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 2:43 PM | $86.33 | $25.83 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $85.74 | $26.27 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IGV | GXPT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IGV | GXPT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $86.33 | $25.83 |
| 1D performance | +0.69% | -1.67% |
| AuM | $10.11 B | $84.78 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.25% |
IGV | GXPT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Global X |
| Benchmark | S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index | MSCI USA Information Technology Index |
| N° of holdings | 103 | 86 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 10, 2001 | July 23, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IGV and GXPT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IGV is down -18.89% year-to-date (YTD), while GXPT has lost -4.15%. That puts GXPT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IGV or GXPT?
Year-to-date, the IGV ETF saw +$3.44B in flows, compared to +$38M for GXPT.
Which ETF is bigger: IGV or GXPT?
As of March 11, 2026, IGV holds $10.11 B in assets under management (AUM), while GXPT manages $84.78 M.
What sectors do the IGV and GXPT ETFs invest in?
IGV leans toward sectors like Information Technology. Meanwhile, GXPT focuses on Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the IGV ETF and GXPT ETF?
IGV top holdings include MICROSOFT-T, PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES and ORACLE SYS. GXPT holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: IGV or GXPT?
IGV holds 115 securities with 72.38% of its assets in the top 15. GXPT has 94 securities and a top 15 weight of 80.87%.
These Industry ETFs Could Be Vulnerable to AI Disruption
ETF Comparison: iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) Versus SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW)
Tech ETFs Surge, Led by Nvidia’s Outstanding Performance
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
