Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IGFvsTPYPETF Comparison
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund ETF - USD (TPYP) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. IGF's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, TPYP's top sector exposures are Energy, Utilities IGF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.4% for TPYP. IGF is up 8.74% year-to-date (YTD) with +$290M in YTD flows. TPYP performs better with 18.63% YTD performance, and +$13M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IGF and TPYP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IGF vs TPYP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IGF TPYP | -0.90%+5.63% | +9.32%+18.94% | +8.74%+18.63% | +30.82%+25.11% | +59.33%+97.28% | +73.10%+154.11% |
| Flows | IGF TPYP | +$177M+$7M | +$443M+$13M | +$290M+$13M | +$2.40B-$15M | +$3.99B-$17M | +$4.62B+$7M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IGF TPYP | +9.83%+12.99% | +11.89%+16.47% | +11.90%+15.03% | +13.21%+17.18% |
| Max drawdown | IGF TPYP | -3.66%-3.05% | -8.54%-12.89% | -14.82%-12.89% | -20.74%-17.85% |
| Max drawdown duration | IGF TPYP | 10d9d | 14d174d | 321d174d | 747d574d |
IGF | TPYP | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $66.83 | $41.91 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $66.94 | $41.59 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IGF | TPYP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IGF | TPYP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $66.83 | $41.91 |
| 1D performance | -0.16% | +0.76% |
| AuM | $10.00 B | $844.59 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.4% |
IGF | TPYP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Tortoise Capital |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Infrastructure Index | Tortoise North American Pipeline Index |
| N° of holdings | 68 | 41 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 10, 2007 | June 30, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IGF and TPYP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IGF is up 8.74% year-to-date (YTD), while TPYP has returned 18.63%. That puts TPYP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IGF or TPYP?
Year-to-date, the IGF ETF saw +$290M in flows, compared to +$13M for TPYP.
Which ETF is more volatile: IGF or TPYP?
Over the past year, IGF had a volatility of 11.89%, while TPYP experienced 16.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: IGF or TPYP?
As of March 11, 2026, IGF holds $10.00 B in assets under management (AUM), while TPYP manages $844.59 M.
What sectors do the IGF and TPYP ETFs invest in?
IGF leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, TPYP focuses on Energy and Utilities.
What are the top holdings of the IGF ETF and TPYP ETF?
IGF top holdings include NEXTERA ENERGY, ES0105046017 and TRANSURBAN GRP REIT. TPYP holds in its top three: KINDER MORGAN, WILLIAMS and TC ENERGY CORP.
Which ETF is more diversified: IGF or TPYP?
IGF holds 78 securities with 50.22% of its assets in the top 15. TPYP has 44 securities and a top 15 weight of 77.23%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
