Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IGFvsMLPXETF Comparison
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. IGF's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, MLPX's top sector exposures are Energy, IGF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.45% for MLPX. IGF is up 8.74% year-to-date (YTD) with +$290M in YTD flows. MLPX performs better with 20.58% YTD performance, and +$64M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IGF and MLPX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IGF vs MLPX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IGF MLPX | -0.90%+5.86% | +9.32%+21.12% | +8.74%+20.58% | +30.82%+25.47% | +59.33%+113.47% | +73.10%+188.87% |
| Flows | IGF MLPX | +$177M+$26M | +$443M+$86M | +$290M+$64M | +$2.40B-$23M | +$3.99B+$1.16B | +$4.62B+$1.21B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IGF MLPX | +9.83%+15.02% | +11.89%+19.04% | +11.90%+16.90% | +13.21%+20.04% |
| Max drawdown | IGF MLPX | -3.66%-3.15% | -8.54%-14.85% | -14.82%-16.47% | -20.74%-19.62% |
| Max drawdown duration | IGF MLPX | 10d9d | 14d294d | 321d370d | 747d427d |
IGF | MLPX | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $66.83 | $72.16 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $66.94 | $71.46 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IGF | MLPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IGF | MLPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $66.83 | $72.16 |
| 1D performance | -0.16% | +0.98% |
| AuM | $10.00 B | $3.19 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.45% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IGF and MLPX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IGF is up 8.74% year-to-date (YTD), while MLPX has returned 20.58%. That puts MLPX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IGF or MLPX?
Year-to-date, the IGF ETF saw +$290M in flows, compared to +$64M for MLPX.
Which ETF is more volatile: IGF or MLPX?
Over the past year, IGF had a volatility of 11.89%, while MLPX experienced 19.04%.
Which ETF is bigger: IGF or MLPX?
As of March 11, 2026, IGF holds $10.00 B in assets under management (AUM), while MLPX manages $3.19 B.
What sectors do the IGF and MLPX ETFs invest in?
IGF leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, MLPX focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the IGF ETF and MLPX ETF?
IGF top holdings include NEXTERA ENERGY, ES0105046017 and TRANSURBAN GRP REIT. MLPX holds in its top three: WILLIAMS, TC ENERGY CORP and ENBRIDGE.
Which ETF is more diversified: IGF or MLPX?
IGF holds 78 securities with 50.22% of its assets in the top 15. MLPX has 26 securities and a top 15 weight of 84.93%.
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Benefit Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
Moving Beyond the 60/40 Convention
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
