Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IGFvsEMLPETF Comparison
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure ETF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure ETF (EMLP) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. IGF's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, EMLP's top sector exposures are Utilities, Energy and Industrials. IGF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.95% for EMLP. IGF is up 8.74% year-to-date (YTD) with +$290M in YTD flows. EMLP performs better with 14.53% YTD performance, and +$79M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IGF and EMLP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IGF vs EMLP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IGF EMLP | -0.90%+5.01% | +9.32%+14.56% | +8.74%+14.53% | +30.82%+23.42% | +59.33%+83.77% | +73.10%+125.27% |
| Flows | IGF EMLP | +$177M+$63M | +$443M+$100M | +$290M+$79M | +$2.40B+$196M | +$3.99B+$71M | +$4.62B+$381M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IGF EMLP | +9.83%+10.15% | +11.89%+13.57% | +11.90%+13.04% | +13.21%+14.61% |
| Max drawdown | IGF EMLP | -3.66%-1.89% | -8.54%-11.20% | -14.82%-11.35% | -20.74%-14.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | IGF EMLP | 10d8d | 14d106d | 321d177d | 747d329d |
IGF | EMLP | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $66.83 | $43.53 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $66.94 | $43.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IGF | EMLP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IGF | EMLP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $66.83 | $43.53 |
| 1D performance | -0.16% | +0.48% |
| AuM | $10.00 B | $3.95 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.95% |
IGF | EMLP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | First Trust |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Infrastructure Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 68 | 60 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 10, 2007 | June 20, 2012 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IGF and EMLP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IGF is up 8.74% year-to-date (YTD), while EMLP has returned 14.53%. That puts EMLP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IGF or EMLP?
Year-to-date, the IGF ETF saw +$290M in flows, compared to +$79M for EMLP.
Which ETF is more volatile: IGF or EMLP?
Over the past year, IGF had a volatility of 11.89%, while EMLP experienced 13.57%.
Which ETF is bigger: IGF or EMLP?
As of March 11, 2026, IGF holds $10.00 B in assets under management (AUM), while EMLP manages $3.95 B.
What sectors do the IGF and EMLP ETFs invest in?
IGF leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, EMLP focuses on Utilities and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the IGF ETF and EMLP ETF?
IGF top holdings include NEXTERA ENERGY, ES0105046017 and TRANSURBAN GRP REIT. EMLP holds in its top three: ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS UNT, ENERGY TRANSFER LP UNITS and MPLX COMMON UNITS.
Which ETF is more diversified: IGF or EMLP?
IGF holds 78 securities with 50.22% of its assets in the top 15. EMLP has 61 securities and a top 15 weight of 51.31%.
How to Obtain Real Asset Exposure by Investing in Infrastructure ETFs
Moving Beyond the 60/40 Convention
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
