IGBHvsQDPLETF Comparison
ETF 1
IGBH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
-0.73%
VS
ETF 2
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
-0.73%
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. IGBH is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.6% for QDPL. IGBH is up 3.68% year-to-date (YTD) with +$134M in YTD flows. QDPL performs better with 12.06% YTD performance, and +$300M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IGBH and QDPL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IGBH vs QDPL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IGBH QDPL | +0.20%+1.34% | +1.78%+1.65% | +3.68%+12.06% | +5.63%+15.84% | +25.01%+73.85% | +30.43%+75.18% |
| Flows | IGBH QDPL | +$37M+$35M | +$72M+$119M | +$134M+$300M | +$150M+$420M | +$213M+$1.37B | -$503M+$1.52B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IGBH QDPL | +2.81%+10.24% | +3.74%+11.68% | +4.67%+13.54% | +5.84%+15.34% |
| Max drawdown | IGBH QDPL | -0.72%-2.82% | -4.03%-8.32% | -6.74%-17.47% | -10.28%-22.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | IGBH QDPL | 24d53d | 102d70d | 138d126d | 596d704d |
Trading data
IGBH | QDPL | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.53 | $45.95 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $24.60 | $46.38 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IGBH | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IGBH | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.53 | $45.95 |
| 1D performance | -0.28% | -0.93% |
| AuM | $273.64 M | $1.83 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
IGBH | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond Index | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 22, 2015 | July 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IGBH
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Sectors
IGBH
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
IGBH
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
IGBH
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about IGBH and QDPL
How have the IGBH and QDPL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, IGBH is up 3.68% year-to-date (YTD), while QDPL has returned 12.06%. That puts QDPL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IGBH or QDPL?
Year-to-date, the IGBH ETF saw +$134M in flows, compared to +$300M for QDPL.
Which ETF is more volatile: IGBH or QDPL?
Over the past year, IGBH had a volatility of 3.74%, while QDPL experienced 11.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: IGBH or QDPL?
As of October 16, 2026, IGBH holds $273.64 M in assets under management (AUM), while QDPL manages $1.83 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about IGBH & QDPL
Advertisement
Advertisement
