ICVTvsBBAGETF Comparison
VS
iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) belongs to the Convertible Bonds segment. JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG) is part of the US Aggregate Bonds segment. ICVT's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, BBAG's top sector exposures are Sovereign, Finance and Industrials. ICVT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.03% for BBAG. ICVT is up 3.96% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3.10B in YTD flows. BBAG performs worse with 0.02% YTD performance, and -$330M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICVT and BBAG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ICVT vs BBAG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/05/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ICVT BBAG | -10.94%+3.01% | -12.66%-0.08% | +3.96%+0.02% | -0.20%+0.70% | +48.59%+15.57% | +13.92%-1.54% |
| Flows | ICVT BBAG | -$434M-$207M | +$558M-$193M | +$3.10B-$330M | +$3.79B-$472M | +$5.09B-$1.17B | +$5.09B-$52M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ICVT BBAG | +16.60%+4.59% | +18.14%+3.93% | +13.04%+4.87% | +13.05%+5.95% |
| Max drawdown | ICVT BBAG | -14.79%-3.28% | -18.24%-4.67% | -18.24%-4.92% | -29.37%-17.62% |
| Max drawdown duration | ICVT BBAG | 80d72d | 137d249d | 137d284d | 1339d1570d |
Trading data
ICVT | BBAG | |
Last sale 11/6/2026 at 2:30 PM | $101.63 | |
| Previous close 11/04/2026 | $100.51 | |
| Consolidated volume 11/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ICVT | BBAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/6/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
ICVT | BBAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $101.63 | – |
| 1D performance | +1.11% | – |
| AuM | $6.86 B | $790.03 M |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.03% |
Characteristics
ICVT | BBAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg U.S. Convertible Cash Pay Bond Index | Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index |
| N° of holdings | 336 | 1074 |
| Asset class | Bonds | Bonds |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 2, 2015 | December 12, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ICVT
USA
71.04%
Other
28.96%
BBAG
USA
76.81%
Other
23.19%
Sectors
ICVT
Technology
28.93%
Finance
10.02%
Healthcare
9.83%
Utilities
7.22%
Industrials
7.12%
Other
36.87%
BBAG
Sovereign
47.79%
Finance
10.57%
Industrials
9.21%
Other
32.43%
Advertisement
Diversification
ICVT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.07%
BBAG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
15.85%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
ICVT
US55024UAK51
1.86%
Alibaba, 0.5% 1jun2031, USD (Conv.)
1.76%
US21873SAL25
1.28%
Bloom Energy, 0% 15nov2030, USD (Conv.)
1.18%
Western Digital, 3% 15nov2028, USD (Conv.)
1.12%
Nebius, 1.25% 15mar2031, USD (Conv.)
1.10%
CoreWeave, 1.75% 1oct2032, USD (Conv.)
1.05%
US63954QAN60
1.00%
US60770KAA51
1.00%
Cloudflare, 0% 15jun2030, USD (Conv.)
0.89%
US63954QAG10
0.82%
US63954QAH92
0.80%
Nebius, 2.625% 15mar2033, USD (Conv.)
0.74%
CoreWeave, 1.75% 1dec2031, USD (Conv.)
0.74%
DoorDash, 0% 15may2030, USD (Conv.)
0.74%
BBAG
USA, Notes 3.875% 30sep2029, USD (Q-2029)
1.91%
USA, Notes 4.25% 15aug2035, USD (E-2035)
1.56%
USA, Notes 3.5% 30apr2028, USD (Y-2028)
1.33%
USA, Notes 2.75% 15aug2032, USD (E-2032)
1.26%
USA, Notes 3.5% 15feb2033, USD (B-2033)
1.13%
USA, Notes 3.5% 30apr2030, USD (K-2030)
1.12%
USA, Notes 3.875% 15aug2033, USD (E-2033)
1.08%
USA, Notes 4.875% 31oct2030, USD (R-2030)
0.97%
USA, Notes 3.375% 15may2033, USD (C-2033)
0.93%
USA, Notes 3.625% 30sep2031, USD (Q-2031)
0.90%
FN MA4624, 3% 1jun2052, USD (ABS)
0.87%
USA, Bonds 3.625% 15feb2053, USD
0.72%
USA, Notes 4.5% 15nov2033, USD (F-2033)
0.72%
USA, Notes 3.75% 31aug2031, USD (P-2031)
0.69%
USA, Notes 3.75% 31dec2028, USD (AH-2028)
0.67%
Frequently asked questions about ICVT and BBAG
How have the ICVT and BBAG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 5, 2026, ICVT is up 3.96% year-to-date (YTD), while BBAG has returned 0.02%. That puts ICVT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ICVT or BBAG?
Year-to-date, the ICVT ETF saw +$3.10B in flows, compared to -$330M for BBAG.
Which ETF is more volatile: ICVT or BBAG?
Over the past year, ICVT had a volatility of 18.14%, while BBAG experienced 3.93%.
Which ETF is bigger: ICVT or BBAG?
As of November 5, 2026, ICVT holds $6.86 B in assets under management (AUM), while BBAG manages $790.03 M.
What sectors do the ICVT and BBAG ETFs invest in?
ICVT leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, BBAG focuses on Sovereign, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ICVT ETF and BBAG ETF?
ICVT top holdings include US55024UAK51, Alibaba, 0.5% 1jun2031, USD (Conv.) and US21873SAL25. BBAG holds in its top three: USA, Notes 3.875% 30sep2029, USD (Q-2029), USA, Notes 4.25% 15aug2035, USD (E-2035) and USA, Notes 3.5% 30apr2028, USD (Y-2028).
Which ETF is more diversified: ICVT or BBAG?
ICVT holds 388 securities with 16.07% of its assets in the top 15. BBAG has 1583 securities and a top 15 weight of 15.85%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ICVT & BBAG
Advertisement
