ICOPvsEMETETF Comparison
VS
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. VanEck Copper and Electrification ETF (EMET) is part of the Natural Resources segment. ICOP's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. In contrast, EMET's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials. ICOP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.62% for EMET. ICOP is up 24.94% year-to-date (YTD) with +$253M in YTD flows. EMET performs worse with 15.55% YTD performance, and +$752K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICOP and EMET below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ICOP vs EMET performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/21/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ICOP EMET | -6.93%-7.26% | +3.36%-2.95% | +24.94%+15.55% | +60.46%+49.50% | +144.51%+84.09% | n/an/a |
| Flows | ICOP EMET | +$18M- | +$8M-$4M | +$253M+$752K | +$316M+$3M | +$383M-$2M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ICOP EMET | +38.45%+37.79% | +39.50%+38.89% | +33.35%+32.17% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | ICOP EMET | -12.61%-16.57% | -25.36%-24.48% | -37.39%-39.33% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ICOP EMET | 27d46d | 96d204d | 478d478d | n/an/a |
Trading data
ICOP | EMET | |
Last sale 9/22/2026 at 1:30 PM | $56.44 | |
| Previous close 09/21/2026 | $55.01 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/21/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ICOP | EMET | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/22/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ICOP | EMET | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $56.44 | – |
| 1D performance | +2.60% | – |
| AuM | $484.02 M | $36.39 M |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.62% |
Characteristics
ICOP | EMET | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | VanEck |
| Benchmark | STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index | MarketVector Global Electrification Metals Index |
| N° of holdings | 45 | 57 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 23, 2023 | November 11, 2021 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ICOP
Canada
26.72%
United Kingdom
17.8%
Australia
16.98%
USA
15.84%
Mexico
8.45%
Other
14.2%
EMET
Canada
20.37%
USA
16.46%
United Kingdom
14.48%
China
13.51%
South Africa
7.83%
Mexico
7.7%
Other
19.64%
Sectors
ICOP
Non-Energy Materi.
96.23%
Other
3.77%
EMET
Non-Energy Materi.
100%
Other
-0%
Advertisement
Diversification
ICOP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.99%
EMET
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
65.83%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
ICOP
Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.
8.45%
Anglo American Plc
8.08%
BHP Group Ltd.
7.98%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
7.83%
Teck Resources Limited
5.53%
Rio Tinto Plc
5.17%
Southern Copper Corp.
4.67%
Evolution Mining Ltd.
4.62%
Antofagasta Plc
4.46%
Lundin Mining Corp.
4.45%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
4.25%
Barrick Mining Corp.
3.51%
KGHM Polska Miedz SA
3.39%
Newmont Corp.
3.31%
Vale SA
3.29%
EMET
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
8.37%
Anglo American Plc
8.36%
Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.
7.70%
Teck Resources Limited
6.94%
Antofagasta Plc
5.15%
Southern Copper Corp.
4.07%
Lundin Mining Corp.
3.56%
Valterra Platinum Ltd.
3.37%
Boliden AB
3.36%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
3.12%
Albemarle Corp.
2.68%
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co. Ltd.
2.48%
KGHM Polska Miedz SA
2.47%
Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd.
2.19%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
2.03%
Frequently asked questions about ICOP and EMET
How have the ICOP and EMET ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 21, 2026, ICOP is up 24.94% year-to-date (YTD), while EMET has returned 15.55%. That puts ICOP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ICOP or EMET?
Year-to-date, the ICOP ETF saw +$253M in flows, compared to +$752K for EMET.
Which ETF is more volatile: ICOP or EMET?
Over the past year, ICOP had a volatility of 39.5%, while EMET experienced 38.89%.
Which ETF is bigger: ICOP or EMET?
As of September 21, 2026, ICOP holds $484.02 M in assets under management (AUM), while EMET manages $36.39 M.
What sectors do the ICOP and EMET ETFs invest in?
ICOP leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, EMET focuses on Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the ICOP ETF and EMET ETF?
ICOP top holdings include Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V., Anglo American Plc and BHP Group Ltd.. EMET holds in its top three: Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., Anglo American Plc and Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V..
Which ETF is more diversified: ICOP or EMET?
ICOP holds 45 securities with 78.99% of its assets in the top 15. EMET has 57 securities and a top 15 weight of 65.83%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ICOP & EMET
Advertisement
