Ready-made ETF portfolios built for real investor needs. Explore now →

Advertisement
Advertisement

ICLNvsURAETF Comparison

ETF 1
ICLN

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

This fund is part of
Alternative Energy
+0%
VS
ETF 2
URA

Global X Uranium ETF

This fund is part of
Alternative Energy
+0%

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. ICLN's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. ICLN is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.69% for URA. ICLN is up 8.67% year-to-date (YTD) with +$89M in YTD flows. URA performs worse with 6.72% YTD performance, and +$894M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICLN and URA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

ICLN vs URA performance and flow charts

Performance

-5051015%Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Cumulative Flows

-250 M-200 M-150 M-100 M-50 M0 M50 M100 MAug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/04/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
ICLN
URA
-3.85%+8.42%
-22.88%-9.21%
+8.67%+6.72%
+25.31%+18.57%
+17.53%+111.92%
-18.71%+125.09%
Flows
ICLN
URA
-$191M+$67M
-$487M+$67M
+$89M+$894M
+$215M+$1.88B
-$1.19B+$2.79B
-$2.06B+$3.96B
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
ICLN
URA
+35.01%+43.14%
+28.80%+45.47%
+24.53%+37.00%
+26.56%+37.36%
Max drawdown
ICLN
URA
-26.70%-25.50%
-28.47%-38.47%
-31.13%-38.47%
-56.66%-38.47%
Max drawdown duration
ICLN
URA
92d92d
94d219d
631d219d
1768d219d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
ICLN
URA
Last sale
9/8/2026 at 1:30 PM
$18.31
$47.50
Previous close
09/04/2026
$17.77
$46.06
Consolidated volume
09/04/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
ICLN
URA
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/8/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ICLN
URA
Last price
$18.31
$47.50
1D performance
+3.04%
+3.13%
AuM$2.06 B$6.40 B
E/R0.38%0.69%
Characteristics
ICLN
URA
Management strategyPassivePassive
ProvideriSharesGlobal X
BenchmarkS&P Global Clean Energy Transition IndexSolactive Global Uranium Index
N° of holdings104-
Asset classEquitiesEquities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateJune 24, 2008November 4, 2010
ESGYesNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

ICLN
USA
36.76%
China
22.42%
Other
40.81%
URA
Data will be available soon

Sectors

ICLN
Industrials
48.56%
Utilities
41.75%
Technology
7.31%
Other
2.39%
URA
Data will be available soon
Advertisement

Diversification

ICLN

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

59.72%
URA
Data will be available soon

Top 15 holdings

Data as of July 31, 2026
ICLN
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
7.92%
First Solar, Inc.
7.85%
Nextpower, Inc.
7.54%
Bloom Energy Corp.
6.96%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.56%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
3.65%
Equatorial SA
3.30%
Plug Power, Inc.
2.70%
EDP SA
2.68%
Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc.
2.46%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
2.35%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.
2.22%
Suzlon Energy Ltd.
2.00%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
1.91%
Ørsted A/S
1.62%
URA
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about ICLN and URA

How have the ICLN and URA ETFs performed in 2026?

As of September 4, 2026, ICLN is up 8.67% year-to-date (YTD), while URA has returned 6.72%. That puts ICLN better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ICLN or URA?

Year-to-date, the ICLN ETF saw +$89M in flows, compared to +$894M for URA.

Which ETF is more volatile: ICLN or URA?

Over the past year, ICLN had a volatility of 28.8%, while URA experienced 45.47%.

Which ETF is bigger: ICLN or URA?

As of September 4, 2026, ICLN holds $2.06 B in assets under management (AUM), while URA manages $6.40 B.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETF Comparison Tool

Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?

Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.