Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ICLNvsURAETF Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. ICLN's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, URA's top sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Financials. ICLN is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.69% for URA. ICLN is up 12.83% year-to-date (YTD) with +$22M in YTD flows. URA performs better with 19.96% YTD performance, and +$826M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICLN and URA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ICLN vs URA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ICLN URA | -2.54%-3.64% | +9.76%+10.56% | +12.83%+19.96% | +63.16%+129.37% | +0.84%+197.31% | -22.05%+246.29% |
| Flows | ICLN URA | +$47M+$155M | +$35M+$1.12B | +$22M+$826M | +$75M+$1.46B | -$1.82B+$2.82B | -$1.08B+$4.06B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ICLN URA | +25.38%+48.48% | +23.12%+42.52% | +22.29%+34.09% | +25.68%+36.57% |
| Max drawdown | ICLN URA | -8.79%-19.14% | -10.55%-28.67% | -44.77%-36.76% | -56.66%-37.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | ICLN URA | 14d42d | 77d97d | 1016d214d | 1591d738d |
ICLN | URA | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $18.51 | $51.36 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $18.25 | $52.31 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ICLN | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ICLN | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $18.51 | $51.36 |
| 1D performance | +1.42% | -1.82% |
| AuM | $2.16 B | $7.14 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.69% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ICLN and URA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, ICLN is up 12.83% year-to-date (YTD), while URA has returned 19.96%. That puts URA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ICLN or URA?
Year-to-date, the ICLN ETF saw +$22M in flows, compared to +$826M for URA.
Which ETF is more volatile: ICLN or URA?
Over the past year, ICLN had a volatility of 23.12%, while URA experienced 42.52%.
Which ETF is bigger: ICLN or URA?
As of March 11, 2026, ICLN holds $2.16 B in assets under management (AUM), while URA manages $7.14 B.
What sectors do the ICLN and URA ETFs invest in?
ICLN leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, URA focuses on Energy and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ICLN ETF and URA ETF?
ICLN top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, US65290E1010 and FIRST SOLAR. URA holds in its top three: CAMECO, ALTC ACQUISITION and URANIUM ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: ICLN or URA?
ICLN holds 101 securities with 60.94% of its assets in the top 15. URA has 48 securities and a top 15 weight of 79.92%.
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
