ICLNvsURAETF Comparison
VS
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. ICLN's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, URA's top sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Financials. ICLN is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.69% for URA. ICLN is up 40.91% year-to-date (YTD) with +$646M in YTD flows. URA performs worse with 17.55% YTD performance, and +$842M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICLN and URA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ICLN vs URA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/04/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ICLN URA | +11.56%-8.20% | +27.91%-3.13% | +40.91%+17.55% | +83.81%+60.15% | +30.02%+167.46% | +10.97%+167.28% |
| Flows | ICLN URA | +$530M-$54M | +$623M+$16M | +$646M+$842M | +$752M+$1.92B | -$975M+$2.87B | -$1.37B+$3.89B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ICLN URA | +28.82%+42.47% | +24.61%+43.41% | +23.01%+35.36% | +25.62%+37.03% |
| Max drawdown | ICLN URA | -6.63%-17.92% | -10.55%-28.67% | -42.62%-36.76% | -56.66%-37.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | ICLN URA | 15d29d | 77d97d | 924d214d | 1676d738d |
Trading data
ICLN | URA | |
Last sale 6/5/2026 at 7:57 PM | $21.35 | $45.42 |
| Previous close 06/04/2026 | $23.10 | $50.28 |
| Consolidated volume 06/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ICLN | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/5/2026 at 7:57 PM
Live
Closed
ICLN | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $21.35 | $45.42 |
| 1D performance | -7.60% | -9.67% |
| AuM | $3.36 B | $6.99 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.69% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ICLN
USA
43.27%
China
20.36%
Other
36.38%
URA
Canada
43.97%
USA
22.13%
Republic of Korea
16.43%
Australia
9.21%
Other
8.25%
Sectors
ICLN
Utilities
34.36%
Industrials
33.07%
Information Techn.
17.31%
Other
15.26%
URA
Energy
51.28%
Industrials
25.36%
Other
23.36%
Advertisement
Diversification
ICLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
60.6%
URA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
77.87%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
ICLN
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
13.73%
US65290E1010
7.28%
FIRST SOLAR
7.15%
YANGTZE POWER
5.89%
VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS
3.35%
PLUG POWER
3.28%
ENPHASE ENERGY
3.24%
EQUATORIAL ENERGIA
2.87%
SUZLON ENERGY
2.36%
ENERGIAS DE PORTUGAL
2.33%
CHUBU ELECTRIC POWER
2.01%
SOLAREDGE TECH/D
1.93%
CLEARWAY ENERGY INC
1.88%
ORSTED
1.84%
ENLIGHT RENEWABLE ENERGY
1.47%
URA
CAMECO
22.37%
ALTC ACQUISITION
6.80%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
6.11%
URANIUM ENERGY
5.42%
US63253R2013
4.77%
DAEWOO ENG&CONST
4.46%
SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM UNIT
4.37%
ENERGY FUELS
4.00%
PALADIN ENERGY
3.34%
HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO LTD
3.30%
CENTRUS ENERGY CORP
2.83%
DOOSAN ENERBILITY
2.82%
DENISON MINES
2.82%
BHP GROUP LTD
2.33%
KEPCO E&C
2.12%
Frequently asked questions about ICLN and URA
How have the ICLN and URA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 4, 2026, ICLN is up 40.91% year-to-date (YTD), while URA has returned 17.55%. That puts ICLN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ICLN or URA?
Year-to-date, the ICLN ETF saw +$646M in flows, compared to +$842M for URA.
Which ETF is more volatile: ICLN or URA?
Over the past year, ICLN had a volatility of 24.61%, while URA experienced 43.41%.
Which ETF is bigger: ICLN or URA?
As of June 4, 2026, ICLN holds $3.36 B in assets under management (AUM), while URA manages $6.99 B.
What sectors do the ICLN and URA ETFs invest in?
ICLN leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, URA focuses on Energy and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ICLN ETF and URA ETF?
ICLN top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, US65290E1010 and FIRST SOLAR. URA holds in its top three: CAMECO, ALTC ACQUISITION and NEXGEN ENERGY LTD.
Which ETF is more diversified: ICLN or URA?
ICLN holds 105 securities with 60.6% of its assets in the top 15. URA has 49 securities and a top 15 weight of 77.87%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ICLN & URA
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
ICLN
Advertisement
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URA
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
Advertisement
