ICLNvsSETMETF Comparison
VS
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. ICLN's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. In contrast, SETM's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. ICLN is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.65% for SETM. ICLN is up 11.64% year-to-date (YTD) with +$72M in YTD flows. SETM performs better with 17.85% YTD performance, and +$347M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICLN and SETM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ICLN vs SETM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/08/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ICLN SETM | +1.32%+4.27% | -12.83%+2.02% | +11.64%+17.85% | +26.60%+55.36% | +23.70%+104.03% | -14.99%n/a |
| Flows | ICLN SETM | +$12M+$14M | -$573M-$4M | +$72M+$347M | +$198M+$481M | -$1.21B+$542M | -$2.07B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ICLN SETM | +32.74%+37.90% | +28.89%+39.28% | +24.59%+31.96% | +26.58%n/a |
| Max drawdown | ICLN SETM | -21.80%-21.45% | -28.47%-29.16% | -31.13%-41.59% | -56.66%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ICLN SETM | 78d70d | 98d222d | 631d427d | 1772dn/a |
Trading data
ICLN | SETM | |
Last sale 9/9/2026 at 1:30 PM | $18.01 | $34.56 |
| Previous close 09/08/2026 | $18.31 | $34.50 |
| Consolidated volume 09/08/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ICLN | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/9/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ICLN | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $18.01 | $34.56 |
| 1D performance | -1.64% | +0.17% |
| AuM | $2.10 B | $619.45 M |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
ICLN | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index | Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Index |
| N° of holdings | 104 | 158 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 24, 2008 | February 1, 2023 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ICLN
USA
36.76%
China
22.42%
Other
40.81%
SETM
Canada
32.5%
USA
22.74%
Australia
20.68%
Other
24.09%
Sectors
ICLN
Industrials
48.56%
Utilities
41.75%
Technology
7.31%
Other
2.39%
SETM
Non-Energy Materi.
74.36%
Energy
24%
Other
1.63%
Diversification
ICLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.72%
SETM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
54.66%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
ICLN
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
7.92%
First Solar, Inc.
7.85%
Nextpower, Inc.
7.54%
Bloom Energy Corp.
6.96%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.56%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
3.65%
Equatorial SA
3.30%
Plug Power, Inc.
2.70%
EDP SA
2.68%
Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc.
2.46%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
2.35%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.
2.22%
Suzlon Energy Ltd.
2.00%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
1.91%
Ørsted A/S
1.62%
SETM
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
5.82%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
5.35%
Cameco Corp.
4.68%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.
4.38%
PLS Group Ltd.
3.84%
Teck Resources Limited
3.60%
Albemarle Corp.
3.50%
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura SAA
3.29%
Uranium Energy Corp.
3.27%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
3.10%
Antofagasta Plc
2.95%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
2.87%
MP Materials Corp.
2.75%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
2.67%
First Majestic Silver Corp.
2.60%
Frequently asked questions about ICLN and SETM
How have the ICLN and SETM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 8, 2026, ICLN is up 11.64% year-to-date (YTD), while SETM has returned 17.85%. That puts SETM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ICLN or SETM?
Year-to-date, the ICLN ETF saw +$72M in flows, compared to +$347M for SETM.
Which ETF is more volatile: ICLN or SETM?
Over the past year, ICLN had a volatility of 28.89%, while SETM experienced 39.28%.
Which ETF is bigger: ICLN or SETM?
As of September 8, 2026, ICLN holds $2.10 B in assets under management (AUM), while SETM manages $619.45 M.
What sectors do the ICLN and SETM ETFs invest in?
ICLN leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Technology. Meanwhile, SETM focuses on Non-Energy Materials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the ICLN ETF and SETM ETF?
ICLN top holdings include China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd., First Solar, Inc. and Nextpower, Inc.. SETM holds in its top three: Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC and Cameco Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: ICLN or SETM?
ICLN holds 104 securities with 59.72% of its assets in the top 15. SETM has 158 securities and a top 15 weight of 54.66%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ICLN & SETM
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
December 19, 2025
SETM
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
ICLN
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
August 14, 2024
ICLN
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
SETM
Advertisement
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
ICLN
Sprott Launches Four New Lithium, Uranium and Copper Miners ETFs
February 15, 2023
SETM
Advertisement
