ICLNvsSETMETF Comparison
VS
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. ICLN's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. In contrast, SETM's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. ICLN is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.65% for SETM. ICLN is up 8.82% year-to-date (YTD) with +$377M in YTD flows. SETM performs worse with 2.63% YTD performance, and +$333M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICLN and SETM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ICLN vs SETM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ICLN SETM | -13.08%-8.44% | -10.70%-19.85% | +8.82%+2.63% | +29.32%+47.85% | -0.54%+76.28% | -15.11%n/a |
| Flows | ICLN SETM | -$260M-$20M | +$276M+$65M | +$377M+$333M | +$515M+$485M | -$1.04B+$530M | -$1.73B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ICLN SETM | +37.00%+40.37% | +28.31%+38.42% | +24.37%+31.40% | +26.38%n/a |
| Max drawdown | ICLN SETM | -24.63%-27.19% | -24.63%-28.06% | -41.79%-41.59% | -56.66%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ICLN SETM | 52d73d | 52d176d | 911d427d | 1726dn/a |
Trading data
ICLN | SETM | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $17.78 | $28.88 |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $18.37 | $29.42 |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ICLN | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ICLN | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $17.78 | $28.88 |
| 1D performance | -3.21% | -1.84% |
| AuM | $2.35 B | $527.95 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
ICLN | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index | Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Index |
| N° of holdings | 104 | 154 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 24, 2008 | February 1, 2023 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ICLN
USA
45.59%
China
18.15%
Other
36.26%
SETM
Canada
31.17%
USA
23.26%
Australia
21.86%
Other
23.71%
Sectors
ICLN
Industrials
56.7%
Utilities
33.46%
Technology
7.95%
Other
1.88%
SETM
Non-Energy Materi.
74.01%
Energy
24.12%
Other
1.88%
Advertisement
Diversification
ICLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
63.9%
SETM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.42%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
ICLN
Bloom Energy Corp.
14.75%
First Solar, Inc.
8.41%
Nextpower, Inc.
7.32%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
5.78%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.87%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
3.11%
Plug Power, Inc.
2.85%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
2.65%
Equatorial SA
2.56%
Suzlon Energy Ltd.
2.52%
EDP SA
2.25%
Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc.
2.22%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
1.60%
Ørsted A/S
1.55%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.
1.46%
SETM
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
5.37%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
5.33%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.
5.08%
Cameco Corp.
5.07%
PLS Group Ltd.
4.20%
Albemarle Corp.
3.69%
MP Materials Corp.
3.42%
Uranium Energy Corp.
3.33%
Teck Resources Limited
3.26%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
3.15%
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura SAA
2.93%
Antofagasta Plc
2.78%
First Majestic Silver Corp.
2.69%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
2.56%
Hecla Mining Co.
2.54%
Frequently asked questions about ICLN and SETM
How have the ICLN and SETM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, ICLN is up 8.82% year-to-date (YTD), while SETM has returned 2.63%. That puts ICLN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ICLN or SETM?
Year-to-date, the ICLN ETF saw +$377M in flows, compared to +$333M for SETM.
Which ETF is more volatile: ICLN or SETM?
Over the past year, ICLN had a volatility of 28.31%, while SETM experienced 38.42%.
Which ETF is bigger: ICLN or SETM?
As of July 24, 2026, ICLN holds $2.35 B in assets under management (AUM), while SETM manages $527.95 M.
What sectors do the ICLN and SETM ETFs invest in?
ICLN leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Technology. Meanwhile, SETM focuses on Non-Energy Materials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the ICLN ETF and SETM ETF?
ICLN top holdings include Bloom Energy Corp., First Solar, Inc. and Nextpower, Inc.. SETM holds in its top three: Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: ICLN or SETM?
ICLN holds 104 securities with 63.9% of its assets in the top 15. SETM has 156 securities and a top 15 weight of 55.42%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ICLN & SETM
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
December 19, 2025
SETM
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
ICLN
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
August 14, 2024
ICLN
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
SETM
Advertisement
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
ICLN
Sprott Launches Four New Lithium, Uranium and Copper Miners ETFs
February 15, 2023
ICLN
Advertisement
