Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ICLNvsNLRETF Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. ICLN's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, NLR's top sector exposures are Energy, Utilities and Industrials. ICLN is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.56% for NLR. ICLN is up 12.83% year-to-date (YTD) with +$22M in YTD flows. NLR performs better with 14.26% YTD performance, and +$687M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICLN and NLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ICLN vs NLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ICLN NLR | -2.54%-3.08% | +9.76%+5.28% | +12.83%+14.26% | +63.16%+93.04% | +0.84%+184.14% | -22.05%+213.22% |
| Flows | ICLN NLR | +$47M+$199M | +$35M+$843M | +$22M+$687M | +$75M+$2.69B | -$1.82B+$3.81B | -$1.08B+$3.84B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ICLN NLR | +25.38%+41.80% | +23.12%+37.32% | +22.29%+29.49% | +25.68%+25.15% |
| Max drawdown | ICLN NLR | -8.79%-16.12% | -10.55%-25.64% | -44.77%-29.79% | -56.66%-29.79% |
| Max drawdown duration | ICLN NLR | 14d42d | 77d104d | 1016d116d | 1591d116d |
ICLN | NLR | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $18.51 | $141.12 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $18.25 | $142.87 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ICLN | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ICLN | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $18.51 | $141.12 |
| 1D performance | +1.42% | -1.22% |
| AuM | $2.16 B | $4.77 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.56% |
ICLN | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | VanEck |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index | MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index |
| N° of holdings | 90 | 23 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 24, 2008 | August 13, 2007 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ICLN and NLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, ICLN is up 12.83% year-to-date (YTD), while NLR has returned 14.26%. That puts NLR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ICLN or NLR?
Year-to-date, the ICLN ETF saw +$22M in flows, compared to +$687M for NLR.
Which ETF is more volatile: ICLN or NLR?
Over the past year, ICLN had a volatility of 23.12%, while NLR experienced 37.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: ICLN or NLR?
As of March 11, 2026, ICLN holds $2.16 B in assets under management (AUM), while NLR manages $4.77 B.
What sectors do the ICLN and NLR ETFs invest in?
ICLN leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, NLR focuses on Energy, Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ICLN ETF and NLR ETF?
ICLN top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, US65290E1010 and FIRST SOLAR. NLR holds in its top three: CAMECO, DENISON MINES and URANIUM ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: ICLN or NLR?
ICLN holds 101 securities with 60.94% of its assets in the top 15. NLR has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 75.88%.
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
