IBATvsURAETF Comparison
VS
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. IBAT's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. In contrast, URA's top sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Financials. IBAT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.69% for URA. IBAT is up 44.6% year-to-date (YTD) with +$39M in YTD flows. URA performs worse with 29.4% YTD performance, and +$935M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBAT and URA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBAT vs URA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBAT URA | +23.75%+15.47% | +28.54%-0.06% | +44.60%+29.40% | +103.87%+137.21% | n/a+230.79% | n/a+252.55% |
| Flows | IBAT URA | +$15M+$103M | +$24M+$571M | +$39M+$935M | +$42M+$1.78B | -+$2.97B | -+$4.07B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBAT URA | +31.38%+48.01% | +23.80%+42.72% | n/a+34.71% | n/a+36.70% |
| Max drawdown | IBAT URA | -11.58%-24.86% | -11.92%-28.67% | n/a-36.76% | n/a-37.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | IBAT URA | 42d86d | 79d97d | n/a214d | n/a738d |
Trading data
IBAT | URA | |
Last sale 4/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.45 | $55.31 |
| Previous close 04/23/2026 | $40.95 | $56.47 |
| Consolidated volume 04/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IBAT | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IBAT | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.45 | $55.31 |
| 1D performance | +1.22% | -2.05% |
| AuM | $61.21 M | $7.80 B |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.69% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBAT
Japan
22.93%
USA
21.54%
Republic of Korea
15.5%
France
9.33%
China
9.01%
Other
21.71%
URA
Canada
46.05%
USA
22.05%
Republic of Korea
13.15%
Australia
9.32%
Other
9.43%
Sectors
IBAT
Industrials
39.65%
Materials
35.25%
Information Techn.
19.44%
Other
5.66%
URA
Energy
53.91%
Industrials
22.79%
Other
23.3%
Advertisement
Diversification
IBAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.3%
URA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
77.56%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
IBAT
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
7.05%
BASF SE
6.63%
AIR LIQUIDE
6.38%
SAMSUNG SDI
6.34%
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS
6.13%
MURATA MFG
5.62%
AMPEREX TECH
5.35%
LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD
4.57%
FURUKAWA ELEC
4.54%
ASAHI KASEI
4.21%
LG CHEMICAL
3.42%
EATON CORP PLC
3.23%
IE000S9YS762
3.18%
ABB
2.86%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE
2.82%
URA
CAMECO
23.52%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
6.56%
URANIUM ENERGY
5.91%
ALTC ACQUISITION
5.57%
US63253R2013
5.27%
SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM UNIT
4.83%
ENERGY FUELS
3.93%
PALADIN ENERGY
3.46%
HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO LTD
3.31%
DENISON MINES
3.01%
CENTRUS ENERGY CORP
2.90%
BHP GROUP LTD
2.40%
DAEWOO ENG&CONST
2.39%
DOOSAN ENERBILITY
2.34%
ITOCHU
2.17%
Frequently asked questions about IBAT and URA
How have the IBAT and URA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 24, 2026, IBAT is up 44.6% year-to-date (YTD), while URA has returned 29.4%. That puts IBAT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBAT or URA?
Year-to-date, the IBAT ETF saw +$39M in flows, compared to +$935M for URA.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBAT or URA?
Over the past year, IBAT had a volatility of 23.8%, while URA experienced 42.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBAT or URA?
As of April 24, 2026, IBAT holds $61.21 M in assets under management (AUM), while URA manages $7.80 B.
What sectors do the IBAT and URA ETFs invest in?
IBAT leans toward sectors like Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, URA focuses on Energy and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the IBAT ETF and URA ETF?
IBAT top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, BASF SE and AIR LIQUIDE. URA holds in its top three: CAMECO, NEXGEN ENERGY LTD and URANIUM ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: IBAT or URA?
IBAT holds 64 securities with 72.3% of its assets in the top 15. URA has 49 securities and a top 15 weight of 77.56%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IBAT & URA
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URA
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
Advertisement
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
URA
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
URA
Nuclear Energy ETFs – Ways to play the energy source
July 19, 2022
URA
Advertisement
