IBATvsNLRETF Comparison
VS
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. IBAT's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. In contrast, NLR's top sector exposures are Energy, Utilities and Industrials. IBAT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.56% for NLR. IBAT is up 43.26% year-to-date (YTD) with +$41M in YTD flows. NLR performs worse with 14.77% YTD performance, and +$937M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBAT and NLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBAT vs NLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBAT NLR | +23.83%+11.01% | +25.65%-12.51% | +43.26%+14.77% | +100.21%+84.12% | n/a+171.36% | n/a+199.80% |
| Flows | IBAT NLR | +$16M+$139M | +$26M+$651M | +$41M+$937M | +$43M+$3.01B | -+$4.06B | -+$4.09B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBAT NLR | +31.44%+40.06% | +23.88%+36.73% | n/a+30.25% | n/a+25.74% |
| Max drawdown | IBAT NLR | -11.58%-21.18% | -11.92%-25.64% | n/a-29.79% | n/a-29.79% |
| Max drawdown duration | IBAT NLR | 42d90d | 79d104d | n/a116d | n/a116d |
Trading data
IBAT | NLR | |
Last sale 4/29/2026 at 6:31 PM | $41.76 | $137.52 |
| Previous close 04/28/2026 | $40.86 | $141.09 |
| Consolidated volume 04/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IBAT | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/29/2026 at 6:31 PM
Live
Closed
IBAT | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.76 | $137.52 |
| 1D performance | +2.19% | -2.53% |
| AuM | $62.28 M | $5.05 B |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.56% |
Characteristics
IBAT | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | VanEck |
| Benchmark | STOXX Global Energy Storage and Materials Index | MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index |
| N° of holdings | 61 | 22 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 19, 2024 | August 13, 2007 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBAT
Japan
22.93%
USA
21.54%
Republic of Korea
15.5%
France
9.33%
China
9.01%
Other
21.71%
NLR
USA
48.48%
Canada
21.11%
Other
30.4%
Sectors
IBAT
Industrials
39.65%
Materials
35.25%
Information Techn.
19.44%
Other
5.66%
NLR
Energy
36.75%
Utilities
35.57%
Industrials
15.84%
Other
11.83%
Advertisement
Diversification
IBAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.3%
NLR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
79.2%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
IBAT
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
7.05%
BASF SE
6.63%
AIR LIQUIDE
6.38%
SAMSUNG SDI
6.34%
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS
6.13%
MURATA MFG
5.62%
AMPEREX TECH
5.35%
LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD
4.57%
FURUKAWA ELEC
4.54%
ASAHI KASEI
4.21%
LG CHEMICAL
3.42%
EATON CORP PLC
3.23%
IE000S9YS762
3.18%
ABB
2.86%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE
2.82%
NLR
CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP
8.73%
CAMECO
7.83%
BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC
6.45%
PUBLIC SRVCE ENT
6.33%
PG&E
5.73%
FORTUM
5.27%
CGN POWER CO LTD
5.07%
US63253R2013
4.74%
CEZ
4.44%
URANIUM ENERGY
4.37%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
4.24%
PALADIN ENERGY
4.23%
DENISON MINES
4.08%
ENERGY FUELS
4.05%
NUSCALE POWER CORPORATION
3.63%
Frequently asked questions about IBAT and NLR
How have the IBAT and NLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 27, 2026, IBAT is up 43.26% year-to-date (YTD), while NLR has returned 14.77%. That puts IBAT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBAT or NLR?
Year-to-date, the IBAT ETF saw +$41M in flows, compared to +$937M for NLR.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBAT or NLR?
Over the past year, IBAT had a volatility of 23.88%, while NLR experienced 36.73%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBAT or NLR?
As of April 27, 2026, IBAT holds $62.28 M in assets under management (AUM), while NLR manages $5.05 B.
What sectors do the IBAT and NLR ETFs invest in?
IBAT leans toward sectors like Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, NLR focuses on Energy, Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the IBAT ETF and NLR ETF?
IBAT top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, BASF SE and AIR LIQUIDE. NLR holds in its top three: CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP, CAMECO and BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: IBAT or NLR?
IBAT holds 64 securities with 72.3% of its assets in the top 15. NLR has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 79.2%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IBAT & NLR
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
NLR
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
February 4, 2025
NLR
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
NLR
Advertisement
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
NLR
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
NLR
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
NLR
Nuclear Energy ETFs – Ways to play the energy source
July 19, 2022
NLR
Advertisement
