New

Explore professionally built ETF model portfolios. Discover now →

Advertisement
Advertisement

IAUMvsFGDLETF Comparison

ETF 1
IAUM

iShares Gold Trust Micro

This fund is part of
Gold
+0%
VS
ETF 2
FGDL

Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF

This fund is part of
Gold
+0%

The ETFs iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) track the LBMA London Gold Market Fixing Price PM Index - USD and belong to the same industry segment: Gold. IAUM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.09%, versus 0.15% for FGDL. IAUM is up 7.67% year-to-date (YTD) with +$815M in YTD flows. FGDL performs better with 9.97% YTD performance, and -$21M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IAUM and FGDL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

IAUM vs FGDL performance and flow charts

Performance

-15.0-10.0-5.00.0%Mar 2Mar 9Mar 16Mar 23Mar 30

Cumulative Flows

-100 M-50 M0 M50 MMar 2Mar 9Mar 16Mar 23Mar 30

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/02/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
IAUM
FGDL
-12.70%-10.82%
+6.56%+8.85%
+7.67%+9.97%
+48.61%+51.02%
+133.44%+137.91%
n/an/a
Flows
IAUM
FGDL
-$91M-$43M
+$815M-$21M
+$815M-$21M
+$3.39B+$156M
+$3.96B+$188M
--
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
IAUM
FGDL
+38.61%+38.55%
+25.93%+25.87%
+18.44%+18.46%
n/an/a
Max drawdown
IAUM
FGDL
-18.35%-18.36%
-18.35%-18.36%
-18.35%-18.36%
n/an/a
Max drawdown duration
IAUM
FGDL
63d62d
63d62d
63d62d
n/an/a
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
IAUM
FGDL
Last sale
4/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
$46.57
$62.20
Previous close
04/02/2026
$47.50
$63.37
Consolidated volume
04/02/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of April 4, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
IAUM
FGDL
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IAUM
FGDL
Last price
$46.57
$62.20
1D performance
-1.96%
-1.85%
AuM$7.25 B$489.10 M
E/R0.09%0.15%
Characteristics
IAUM
FGDL
Management strategyPassivePassive
ProvideriSharesFranklin Templeton
BenchmarkLBMA London Gold Market Fixing Price PM IndexLBMA London Gold Market Fixing Price PM Index
N° of holdings--
Asset classCommoditiesCommodities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateJune 15, 2021June 29, 2022
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

IAUM
Data will be available soon
FGDL
Data will be available soon

Sectors

IAUM
Data will be available soon
FGDL
Data will be available soon
Advertisement

Diversification

IAUM
Data will be available soon
FGDL
Data will be available soon

Top 15 holdings

Data as of January 1, 1970
IAUM
Data will be available soon
FGDL
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about IAUM and FGDL

How have the IAUM and FGDL ETFs performed in 2026?

As of April 2, 2026, IAUM is up 7.67% year-to-date (YTD), while FGDL has returned 9.97%. That puts FGDL better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IAUM or FGDL?

Year-to-date, the IAUM ETF saw +$815M in flows, compared to -$21M for FGDL.

Which ETF is more volatile: IAUM or FGDL?

Over the past year, IAUM had a volatility of 25.93%, while FGDL experienced 25.87%.

Which ETF is bigger: IAUM or FGDL?

As of April 2, 2026, IAUM holds $7.25 B in assets under management (AUM), while FGDL manages $489.10 M.

Advertisement
Latest news about IAUM & FGDL
Advertisement
Advertisement
Webcast on Demand

Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution

Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.

Accepted for 1 CE Credit

Calamos Webcast