HYLSvsQDPLETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
-1.21%
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. HYLS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.6% for QDPL. HYLS is up 1.94% year-to-date (YTD) with -$77M in YTD flows. QDPL performs better with 10.85% YTD performance, and +$311M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of HYLS and QDPL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
HYLS vs QDPL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HYLS QDPL | +1.47%-0.94% | -0.76%+1.75% | +1.94%+10.85% | +2.26%+11.57% | +21.78%+79.62% | +9.95%+68.91% |
| Flows | HYLS QDPL | +$20M+$26M | +$20M+$114M | -$77M+$311M | -$60M+$404M | +$201M+$1.38B | -$324M+$1.53B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | HYLS QDPL | +3.25%+9.99% | +3.13%+11.76% | +3.55%+13.51% | +5.19%+15.37% |
| Max drawdown | HYLS QDPL | -3.27%-2.92% | -3.27%-8.32% | -3.27%-17.47% | -16.13%-22.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | HYLS QDPL | 74d24d | 74d70d | 74d126d | 1066d704d |
Trading data
HYLS | QDPL | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.74 | $45.22 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $39.80 | $46.18 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
HYLS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexHYLS | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
HYLS | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.74 | $45.22 |
| 1D performance | -0.15% | -2.08% |
| AuM | $1.61 B | $1.82 B |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
HYLS | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 25, 2013 | July 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
HYLS
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Sectors
HYLS
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
HYLS
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
HYLS
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about HYLS and QDPL
How have the HYLS and QDPL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 29, 2026, HYLS is up 1.94% year-to-date (YTD), while QDPL has returned 10.85%. That puts QDPL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: HYLS or QDPL?
Year-to-date, the HYLS ETF saw -$77M in flows, compared to +$311M for QDPL.
Which ETF is more volatile: HYLS or QDPL?
Over the past year, HYLS had a volatility of 3.13%, while QDPL experienced 11.76%.
Which ETF is bigger: HYLS or QDPL?
As of October 29, 2026, HYLS holds $1.61 B in assets under management (AUM), while QDPL manages $1.82 B.
Latest news about HYLS & QDPL
Advertisement
