HYHGvsQDPLETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
+0.17%
ProShares High Yield—Interest Rate Hedged ETF (HYHG) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. HYHG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.6% for QDPL. HYHG is up 3.35% year-to-date (YTD) with +$94M in YTD flows. QDPL performs better with 13.19% YTD performance, and +$300M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of HYHG and QDPL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
HYHG vs QDPL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HYHG QDPL | -1.42%+1.95% | -0.22%+2.21% | +3.35%+13.19% | +5.09%+16.30% | +27.41%+75.61% | +38.04%+77.50% |
| Flows | HYHG QDPL | -$14M+$39M | +$76M+$123M | +$94M+$300M | +$86M+$420M | +$133M+$1.37B | +$122M+$1.52B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | HYHG QDPL | +3.24%+10.08% | +2.94%+11.65% | +3.89%+13.53% | +5.96%+15.33% |
| Max drawdown | HYHG QDPL | -1.83%-3.09% | -1.83%-8.32% | -5.32%-17.47% | -9.75%-22.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | HYHG QDPL | 24d16d | 24d70d | 107d126d | 282d704d |
Trading data
HYHG | QDPL | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $63.13 | $45.95 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $63.42 | $46.38 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
HYHG | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
HYHG | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $63.13 | $45.95 |
| 1D performance | -0.46% | -0.93% |
| AuM | $249.90 M | $1.85 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
HYHG | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | FTSE High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Bonds | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 21, 2013 | July 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
HYHG
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Sectors
HYHG
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
HYHG
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
HYHG
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about HYHG and QDPL
How have the HYHG and QDPL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, HYHG is up 3.35% year-to-date (YTD), while QDPL has returned 13.19%. That puts QDPL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: HYHG or QDPL?
Year-to-date, the HYHG ETF saw +$94M in flows, compared to +$300M for QDPL.
Which ETF is more volatile: HYHG or QDPL?
Over the past year, HYHG had a volatility of 2.94%, while QDPL experienced 11.65%.
Which ETF is bigger: HYHG or QDPL?
As of October 15, 2026, HYHG holds $249.90 M in assets under management (AUM), while QDPL manages $1.85 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about HYHG & QDPL
Advertisement
Advertisement
