HTAXvsBSMQETF Comparison
Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HTAX) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Municipal. HTAX is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.18% for BSMQ. HTAX is down -0.67% year-to-date (YTD) with +$64M in YTD flows. BSMQ performs better with 1.71% YTD performance, and -$47M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of HTAX and BSMQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
HTAX vs BSMQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HTAX BSMQ | +3.76%+0.65% | -3.09%+0.50% | -0.67%+1.71% | -0.78%+2.23% | n/a+11.83% | n/a+2.97% |
| Flows | HTAX BSMQ | +$34M-$9M | +$37M-$16M | +$64M-$47M | +$66M-$38M | -+$132M | -+$230M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | HTAX BSMQ | +6.88%+0.65% | +4.51%+0.47% | n/a+1.17% | n/a+2.01% |
| Max drawdown | HTAX BSMQ | -7.01%-0.38% | -8.03%-0.38% | n/a-1.47% | n/a-11.16% |
| Max drawdown duration | HTAX BSMQ | 77d44d | 115d44d | n/a68d | n/a1347d |
HTAX | BSMQ | |
Last sale 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $23.55 | $23.47 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $23.49 | $23.47 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
HTAX | BSMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
HTAX | BSMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $23.55 | $23.47 |
| 1D performance | +0.23% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $94.59 M | $253.93 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.18% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
