Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
HRTSvsFHLCETF Comparison
Tema GLP-1, Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) belongs to the Tomorrow's Treatments segment. Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) is part of the US Health Care segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Health Care. HRTS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.99%, versus 0.08% for FHLC. HRTS is down -4.67% year-to-date (YTD) with -$713K in YTD flows. FHLC performs better with -3.62% YTD performance, and +$111M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of HRTS and FHLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
HRTS vs FHLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HRTS FHLC | -5.84%-3.62% | -4.63%-3.11% | -4.67%-3.62% | +15.66%+7.04% | n/a+25.79% | n/a+31.14% |
| Flows | HRTS FHLC | -$2M+$34M | +$712K+$130M | -$713K+$111M | -$17M-$3M | --$619M | --$224M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | HRTS FHLC | +14.54%+13.62% | +17.68%+17.37% | n/a+13.71% | n/a+14.82% |
| Max drawdown | HRTS FHLC | -7.89%-6.70% | -13.50%-11.86% | n/a-16.88% | n/a-17.78% |
| Max drawdown duration | HRTS FHLC | 65d64d | 163d190d | n/a435d | n/a762d |
HRTS | FHLC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.67 | $71.40 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $33.85 | $71.59 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
HRTS | FHLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
HRTS | FHLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.67 | $71.40 |
| 1D performance | -0.54% | -0.27% |
| AuM | $51.53 M | $2.84 B |
| E/R | 0.99% | 0.08% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the HRTS and FHLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, HRTS is down -4.67% year-to-date (YTD), while FHLC has lost -3.62%. That puts FHLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: HRTS or FHLC?
Year-to-date, the HRTS ETF saw -$713K in flows, compared to +$111M for FHLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: HRTS or FHLC?
Over the past year, HRTS had a volatility of 17.68%, while FHLC experienced 17.37%.
Which ETF is bigger: HRTS or FHLC?
As of March 13, 2026, HRTS holds $51.53 M in assets under management (AUM), while FHLC manages $2.84 B.
What sectors do the HRTS and FHLC ETFs invest in?
HRTS leans toward sectors like Health Care. Meanwhile, FHLC focuses on Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the HRTS ETF and FHLC ETF?
HRTS top holdings include LILLY, US7711951043 and JOHNSON&JOHNSON. FHLC holds in its top three: LILLY, JOHNSON&JOHNSON and ABBVIE.
Which ETF is more diversified: HRTS or FHLC?
HRTS holds 44 securities with 61.09% of its assets in the top 15. FHLC has 328 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.98%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
