BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

HAPvsCSNRETF Comparison

ETF 1

HAP

VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF

This fund is part of

Natural Resources

+0.53%

Full HAP fund page

VS

ETF 2

CSNR

Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF

This fund is part of

Natural Resources

+0.53%

Full CSNR fund page

VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. HAP's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. In contrast, CSNR's top sector exposures are Energy, Non-Energy Materials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. HAP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.41%, versus 0.7% for CSNR. HAP is up 29.62% year-to-date (YTD) with +$56M in YTD flows. CSNR performs worse with 27.56% YTD performance, and +$47M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of HAP and CSNR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

HAP vs CSNR performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 09/02/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	HAP CSNR	+10.01%+9.73%	+6.09%+4.28%	+29.62%+27.56%	+43.86%+41.83%	+68.08%n/a	+92.00%n/a
Flows	HAP CSNR	-$4M+$7M	-$31M+$4M	+$56M+$47M	+$77M+$54M	+$93M-	+$142M-

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	HAP CSNR	+15.55%+15.95%	+15.51%+16.64%	+15.55%n/a	+17.81%n/a
Max drawdown	HAP CSNR	-7.68%-11.19%	-9.00%-12.00%	-16.54%n/a	-25.54%n/a
Max drawdown duration	HAP CSNR	66d77d	97d127d	251dn/a	1147dn/a

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	HAP	CSNR
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM	$77.89	$38.90
Previous close 09/02/2026	$76.93	$38.59
Consolidated volume 09/02/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of August 31, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

CSNR

is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	HAP	CSNR
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM

Live

Closed

	HAP	CSNR
Last price	$77.89	$38.90
1D performance	+1.25%	+0.82%
AuM	$326.99 M	$112.71 M
E/R	0.41%	0.7%

Characteristics

	HAP	CSNR
Management strategy	Passive	Active
Provider	VanEck	Cohen & Steers
Benchmark	MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index	-
N° of holdings	120	57
Asset class	-	-
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	August 29, 2008	February 6, 2025
ESG	No	No

More HAP data on Trackinsight

More CSNR data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

HAP

USA

42.09%

Canada

14.47%

United Kingdom

7.19%

Other

36.25%

CSNR

USA

36.26%

Canada

19.96%

United Kingdom

8.85%

Other

34.93%

Sectors

HAP

Non-Energy Materi.

38.18%

Energy

26.69%

Industrials

10.92%

Utilities

9.15%

Other

15.05%

CSNR

Energy

36.59%

Non-Energy Materi.

36.21%

Consumer Non-Cycl.

15.57%

Other

11.62%

Diversification

HAP

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

45.86%

CSNR

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

50.2%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of July 31, 2026

HAP

Deere & Co.

5.15%

US30233Q1085

5.02%

Chevron Corp.

4.87%

Iberdrola SA

3.99%

NextEra Energy, Inc.

3.83%

Bayer AG

3.81%

Corteva, Inc.

3.35%

BHP Group Ltd.

3.12%

Nutrien Ltd.

2.36%

Shell Plc

2.09%

Rio Tinto Plc

1.82%

TotalEnergies SE

1.76%

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.

1.69%

Newmont Corp.

1.52%

Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.

1.48%

CSNR

US30233Q1085

6.33%

Shell Plc

4.78%

Bunge Global SA

4.12%

Nutrien Ltd.

3.84%

Suncor Energy, Inc.

3.57%

Glencore Plc

3.07%

Corteva, Inc.

2.98%

TotalEnergies SE

2.95%

Franco-Nevada Corp.

2.94%

Smithfield Foods, Inc.

2.72%

Mowi ASA

2.71%

Eni SpA

2.58%

Reliance Industries Ltd.

2.57%

Newmont Corp.

2.56%

Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.

2.49%

Frequently asked questions about HAP and CSNR

How have the HAP and CSNR ETFs performed in 2026?

As of September 2, 2026, HAP is up 29.62% year-to-date (YTD), while CSNR has returned 27.56%. That puts HAP better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: HAP or CSNR?

Year-to-date, the HAP ETF saw +$56M in flows, compared to +$47M for CSNR.

Which ETF is more volatile: HAP or CSNR?

Over the past year, HAP had a volatility of 15.51%, while CSNR experienced 16.64%.

Which ETF is bigger: HAP or CSNR?

As of September 2, 2026, HAP holds $326.99 M in assets under management (AUM), while CSNR manages $112.71 M.

What sectors do the HAP and CSNR ETFs invest in?

HAP leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. Meanwhile, CSNR focuses on Energy, Non-Energy Materials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.

What are the top holdings of the HAP ETF and CSNR ETF?

HAP top holdings include Deere & Co., US30233Q1085 and Chevron Corp.. CSNR holds in its top three: US30233Q1085, Shell Plc and Bunge Global SA.

Which ETF is more diversified: HAP or CSNR?

HAP holds 120 securities with 45.86% of its assets in the top 15. CSNR has 59 securities and a top 15 weight of 50.2%.

Cohen & Steers Enters the ETF World with Triple Launch

February 10, 2025

CSNR

HAPvsCSNRETF Comparison

VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF

Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF

HAP vs CSNR performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the HAP and CSNR ETFs performed in 2026?

As of September 2, 2026, HAP is up 29.62% year-to-date (YTD), while CSNR has returned 27.56%. That puts HAP better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: HAP or CSNR?

Year-to-date, the HAP ETF saw +$56M in flows, compared to +$47M for CSNR.

Which ETF is more volatile: HAP or CSNR?

Over the past year, HAP had a volatility of 15.51%, while CSNR experienced 16.64%.

Which ETF is bigger: HAP or CSNR?

As of September 2, 2026, HAP holds $326.99 M in assets under management (AUM), while CSNR manages $112.71 M.

What sectors do the HAP and CSNR ETFs invest in?

HAP leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. Meanwhile, CSNR focuses on Energy, Non-Energy Materials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.

What are the top holdings of the HAP ETF and CSNR ETF?

HAP top holdings include Deere & Co., US30233Q1085 and Chevron Corp.. CSNR holds in its top three: US30233Q1085, Shell Plc and Bunge Global SA.

Which ETF is more diversified: HAP or CSNR?

HAP holds 120 securities with 45.86% of its assets in the top 15. CSNR has 59 securities and a top 15 weight of 50.2%.

Cohen & Steers Enters the ETF World with Triple Launch

Build and Analyze Your ETF Portfolio Like a Pro