GXCvsCQQQETF Comparison
VS
State Street SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. GXC's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Communication Services. In contrast, CQQQ's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. GXC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.65% for CQQQ. GXC is down -1.69% year-to-date (YTD) with +$469K in YTD flows. CQQQ performs worse with -5.34% YTD performance, and +$14M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GXC and CQQQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GXC vs CQQQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GXC CQQQ | +5.15%+9.70% | -8.50%-13.38% | -1.69%-5.34% | +19.92%+21.30% | +33.62%+21.44% | -18.75%-39.27% |
| Flows | GXC CQQQ | -$20M-$31M | +$469K-$120M | +$469K+$14M | +$11M+$1.74B | -$747M+$1.88B | -$528M+$2.01B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GXC CQQQ | +21.19%+28.60% | +17.82%+26.75% | +22.72%+28.78% | +25.22%+32.70% |
| Max drawdown | GXC CQQQ | -14.20%-21.33% | -14.69%-24.05% | -24.55%-35.95% | -54.24%-67.09% |
| Max drawdown duration | GXC CQQQ | 90d90d | 209d205d | 423d470d | 1793d1766d |
Trading data
GXC | CQQQ | |
Last sale 4/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $96.21 | $51.01 |
| Previous close 04/29/2026 | $94.76 | $49.08 |
| Consolidated volume 04/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of April 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
GXC | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GXC | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $96.21 | $51.01 |
| 1D performance | +1.53% | +3.93% |
| AuM | $484.11 M | $2.66 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
GXC | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P China BMI Index | FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 1053 | 145 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 20, 2007 | December 8, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GXC
China
49.76%
Cayman Islands
38.6%
Other
11.64%
CQQQ
Cayman Islands
47.52%
China
37.29%
USA
12.31%
Other
2.88%
Sectors
GXC
Consumer Discreti.
22.34%
Financials
16.87%
Communication Ser.
14.38%
Information Techn.
9.12%
Industrials
8.22%
Materials
7.03%
Other
22.03%
CQQQ
Information Techn.
37.91%
Communication Ser.
28.66%
Consumer Discreti.
19.81%
Other
13.62%
Advertisement
Diversification
GXC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
38.9%
CQQQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
61.74%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
GXC
TENCENT HOLDINGS
10.66%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
8.22%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK
3.05%
PINDUODUO INC ADR
2.26%
XIAOMI CORP
1.99%
INDUSTRIAL COMMERC BK CHINA
1.95%
MEITUAN
1.69%
BANK OF CHINA
1.47%
BYD
1.42%
PING AN
1.40%
JD.COM INC
1.22%
NETEASE INC
1.08%
BAIDU
0.88%
TRIP.COM GROUP
0.81%
ZIJIN MINING
0.80%
CQQQ
MEITUAN
9.80%
TENCENT HOLDINGS
9.63%
PINDUODUO INC ADR
9.49%
BAIDU
6.60%
KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY
4.97%
KYG4602S1057
3.03%
HUA HONG SEMICONDUCTOR
2.88%
SENSETIME GROUP INC
2.65%
BILIBILI
2.51%
CNE100005PT2
2.00%
TENCENT MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT GROUP ADR
1.82%
SUNNY OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY
1.75%
CAMBRICON TECHNOLOGIES CORP LTD
1.68%
GDS HOLDINGS
1.64%
NAURA TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO LTD
1.28%
Frequently asked questions about GXC and CQQQ
How have the GXC and CQQQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 29, 2026, GXC is down -1.69% year-to-date (YTD), while CQQQ has lost -5.34%. That puts GXC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GXC or CQQQ?
Year-to-date, the GXC ETF saw +$469K in flows, compared to +$14M for CQQQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: GXC or CQQQ?
Over the past year, GXC had a volatility of 17.82%, while CQQQ experienced 26.75%.
Which ETF is bigger: GXC or CQQQ?
As of April 29, 2026, GXC holds $484.11 M in assets under management (AUM), while CQQQ manages $2.66 B.
What sectors do the GXC and CQQQ ETFs invest in?
GXC leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Communication Services. Meanwhile, CQQQ focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the GXC ETF and CQQQ ETF?
GXC top holdings include TENCENT HOLDINGS, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD and CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK. CQQQ holds in its top three: MEITUAN, TENCENT HOLDINGS and PINDUODUO INC ADR.
Which ETF is more diversified: GXC or CQQQ?
GXC holds 1181 securities with 38.9% of its assets in the top 15. CQQQ has 173 securities and a top 15 weight of 61.74%.
Advertisement
Latest news about GXC & CQQQ
Bridging the Gap: Unpacking the Divergence Between Chinese and US Markets
February 19, 2024
CQQQ
China's Stock Market Struggles Amid Evergrande Crisis
February 5, 2024
CQQQ
Chinese ETFs surge after Zero-COVID policy is relaxed
December 8, 2022
GXC
Advertisement
Advertisement
