GXCvsCQQQETF Comparison
VS
State Street SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. GXC's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, CQQQ's top sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. GXC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.65% for CQQQ. GXC is down -5.42% year-to-date (YTD) with +$14M in YTD flows. CQQQ performs better with -0.95% YTD performance, and +$467M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GXC and CQQQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GXC vs CQQQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/04/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GXC CQQQ | +4.37%-5.75% | -3.72%+1.68% | -5.42%-0.95% | +1.74%+12.07% | +25.74%+23.57% | -11.09%-26.34% |
| Flows | GXC CQQQ | +$13M+$158M | +$13M+$453M | +$14M+$467M | +$28M+$2.04B | -$644M+$2.33B | -$647M+$2.36B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GXC CQQQ | +19.88%+36.58% | +18.90%+30.34% | +22.52%+29.66% | +24.96%+33.03% |
| Max drawdown | GXC CQQQ | -13.27%-13.31% | -19.17%-24.05% | -23.08%-34.97% | -48.72%-62.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | GXC CQQQ | 89d35d | 306d302d | 284d422d | 1792d1792d |
Trading data
GXC | CQQQ | |
Last sale 8/5/2026 at 1:30 PM | $91.80 | $52.02 |
| Previous close 08/04/2026 | $91.95 | $51.69 |
| Consolidated volume 08/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
GXC | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/5/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GXC | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $91.80 | $52.02 |
| 1D performance | -0.16% | +0.64% |
| AuM | $476.05 M | $3.22 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
GXC | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P China BMI Index | FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 1141 | 174 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 20, 2007 | December 8, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GXC
China
88.17%
Other
11.83%
CQQQ
China
86.66%
Ireland
8.98%
Other
4.36%
Sectors
GXC
Technology
26.48%
Finance
19.04%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
12.73%
Industrials
9.92%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.2%
Other
23.62%
CQQQ
Technology
68.11%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.98%
Consumer Services
8.29%
Other
14.62%
Advertisement
Diversification
GXC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
35.01%
CQQQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
58.25%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
GXC
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
9.92%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
6.76%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.07%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
1.92%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
1.78%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.53%
Meituan
1.47%
Xiaomi Corp.
1.43%
NetEase, Inc.
1.34%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.27%
JD.com, Inc.
1.06%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.02%
Baidu, Inc.
0.96%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
0.78%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
0.70%
CQQQ
PDD Holdings, Inc.
8.98%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
8.57%
Meituan
7.99%
Baidu, Inc.
7.33%
Hua Hong Semiconductor Ltd.
4.59%
Kuaishou Technology
3.90%
Kingboard Laminates Holdings Ltd.
3.86%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
2.51%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
2.20%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
1.62%
GigaDevice Semiconductor, Inc.
1.41%
SenseTime Group, Inc.
1.38%
Sunny Optical Technology (Group) Co., Ltd.
1.36%
Suzhou Dongshan Precision Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.30%
Bilibili, Inc.
1.26%
Frequently asked questions about GXC and CQQQ
How have the GXC and CQQQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 4, 2026, GXC is down -5.42% year-to-date (YTD), while CQQQ has lost -0.95%. That puts CQQQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GXC or CQQQ?
Year-to-date, the GXC ETF saw +$14M in flows, compared to +$467M for CQQQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: GXC or CQQQ?
Over the past year, GXC had a volatility of 18.9%, while CQQQ experienced 30.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: GXC or CQQQ?
As of August 4, 2026, GXC holds $476.05 M in assets under management (AUM), while CQQQ manages $3.22 B.
What sectors do the GXC and CQQQ ETFs invest in?
GXC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, CQQQ focuses on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services.
What are the top holdings of the GXC ETF and CQQQ ETF?
GXC top holdings include Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp.. CQQQ holds in its top three: PDD Holdings, Inc., Tencent Holdings Ltd. and Meituan.
Which ETF is more diversified: GXC or CQQQ?
GXC holds 1204 securities with 35.01% of its assets in the top 15. CQQQ has 180 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.25%.
Advertisement
Latest news about GXC & CQQQ
Bridging the Gap: Unpacking the Divergence Between Chinese and US Markets
February 19, 2024
CQQQ
China's Stock Market Struggles Amid Evergrande Crisis
February 5, 2024
CQQQ
Chinese ETFs surge after Zero-COVID policy is relaxed
December 8, 2022
GXC
Advertisement
Advertisement
