Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GVUSvsFELVETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Value. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. GVUS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.18% for FELV. GVUS is up 4.02% year-to-date (YTD) with -$18M in YTD flows. FELV performs worse with 2.8% YTD performance, and +$160M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GVUS and FELV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GVUS vs FELV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GVUS FELV | -2.64%-2.42% | +5.35%+2.83% | +4.02%+2.80% | +19.15%+18.80% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | GVUS FELV | -+$138M | -$18M+$174M | -$18M+$160M | -$52M+$241M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GVUS FELV | +11.01%+10.45% | +15.69%+15.49% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | GVUS FELV | -3.43%-3.30% | -12.05%-12.02% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GVUS FELV | 8d9d | 52d52d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
GVUS | FELV | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $55.90 | $35.56 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $56.01 | $35.67 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GVUS | FELV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GVUS | FELV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $55.90 | $35.56 |
| 1D performance | -0.20% | -0.31% |
| AuM | $403.25 M | $2.77 B |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.18% |
GVUS | FELV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 786 | 303 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 29, 2023 | November 20, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GVUS and FELV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, GVUS is up 4.02% year-to-date (YTD), while FELV has returned 2.8%. That puts GVUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GVUS or FELV?
Year-to-date, the GVUS ETF saw -$18M in flows, compared to +$160M for FELV.
Which ETF is more volatile: GVUS or FELV?
Over the past year, GVUS had a volatility of 15.69%, while FELV experienced 15.49%.
Which ETF is bigger: GVUS or FELV?
As of March 9, 2026, GVUS holds $403.25 M in assets under management (AUM), while FELV manages $2.77 B.
What sectors do the GVUS and FELV ETFs invest in?
GVUS leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, FELV focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the GVUS ETF and FELV ETF?
GVUS top holdings include BERKSHIRE HATHWAY, JPMORGAN CHASE and ALPHABET INC-CL. FELV holds in its top three: BERKSHIRE HATHWAY, JPMORGAN CHASE and AMAZON.COM INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: GVUS or FELV?
GVUS holds 848 securities with 23.92% of its assets in the top 15. FELV has 317 securities and a top 15 weight of 25.03%.
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Active ETFs
Fidelity Continues Trend of Mutual Fund Conversions to ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
