Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GSCvsQSMLETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) belongs to the US Small Cap segment. WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. GSC's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. In contrast, QSML's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. GSC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.8%, versus 0.38% for QSML. GSC is up 2.02% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. QSML performs worse with -3.59% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GSC and QSML below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GSC vs QSML performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GSC QSML | -7.63%-4.93% | -1.71%-5.60% | +2.02%-3.59% | +19.32%+14.02% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | GSC QSML | -$2M- | +$7M- | +$4M- | -$4M+$1M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GSC QSML | +18.61%+16.67% | +23.20%+22.87% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | GSC QSML | -8.39%-8.79% | -15.53%-16.17% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GSC QSML | 29d49d | 45d46d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
GSC | QSML | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $53.95 | $27.70 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $54.04 | $27.73 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GSC | QSML | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GSC | QSML | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $53.95 | $27.70 |
| 1D performance | -0.17% | -0.09% |
| AuM | $156.79 M | $9.71 M |
| E/R | 0.8% | 0.38% |
GSC | QSML | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | - | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth SmallCap Index |
| N° of holdings | 88 | 356 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 5, 2023 | January 25, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GSC and QSML ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GSC is up 2.02% year-to-date (YTD), while QSML has lost -3.59%. That puts GSC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GSC or QSML?
Year-to-date, the GSC ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to - for QSML.
Which ETF is more volatile: GSC or QSML?
Over the past year, GSC had a volatility of 23.2%, while QSML experienced 22.87%.
Which ETF is bigger: GSC or QSML?
As of March 11, 2026, GSC holds $156.79 M in assets under management (AUM), while QSML manages $9.71 M.
What sectors do the GSC and QSML ETFs invest in?
GSC leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, QSML focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the GSC ETF and QSML ETF?
GSC top holdings include PIPER SANDLER COMPANIES, MOOG and ONTO INNOVATION INC. QSML holds in its top three: US44812J1043, ENERSYS and ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS.
Which ETF is more diversified: GSC or QSML?
GSC holds 96 securities with 23.56% of its assets in the top 15. QSML has 388 securities and a top 15 weight of 9.2%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
