Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GRNJvsBCSMETF Comparison
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ) and Baron SMID Cap ETF (BCSM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. GRNJ's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Materials. In contrast, BCSM's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. Both GRNJ and BCSM have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%. GRNJ is down -0.92% year-to-date (YTD) with +$197M in YTD flows. BCSM performs worse with -5.18% YTD performance, and +$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GRNJ and BCSM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GRNJ vs BCSM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GRNJ BCSM | -6.28%-1.15% | -3.78%-5.72% | -0.92%-5.18% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | GRNJ BCSM | +$51M+$686K | +$245M+$19M | +$197M+$3M | -- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GRNJ BCSM | +29.27%+18.30% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | GRNJ BCSM | -12.06%-11.12% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GRNJ BCSM | 52d55d | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
GRNJ | BCSM | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 2:35 PM | $25.44 | $22.42 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $25.28 | $22.20 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
GRNJ | BCSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.44 | $22.42 |
| 1D performance | +0.63% | +0.99% |
| AuM | $370.94 M | $17.82 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.75% |
GRNJ | BCSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Fundstrat | Baron Capital |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 47 | 39 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 18, 2025 | December 12, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GRNJ and BCSM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, GRNJ is down -0.92% year-to-date (YTD), while BCSM has lost -5.18%. That puts GRNJ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GRNJ or BCSM?
Year-to-date, the GRNJ ETF saw +$197M in flows, compared to +$3M for BCSM.
Which ETF is bigger: GRNJ or BCSM?
As of March 12, 2026, GRNJ holds $370.94 M in assets under management (AUM), while BCSM manages $17.82 M.
What sectors do the GRNJ and BCSM ETFs invest in?
GRNJ leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Materials. Meanwhile, BCSM focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the GRNJ ETF and BCSM ETF?
GRNJ top holdings include US7731211089, ROYAL GOLD and LUMENTUM HOLDINGS. BCSM holds in its top three: MERCURY SYSTEMS INC, US19247G1076 and BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON HOLDING.
Which ETF is more diversified: GRNJ or BCSM?
GRNJ holds 51 securities with 36.42% of its assets in the top 15. BCSM has 40 securities and a top 15 weight of 35.14%.
Ask the Manager: Michael Baron on the Case for Active Management
Baron Capital Debuts Three Active ETFs on NYSE
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
