Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GNRvsPHOETF Comparison
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. GNR's top 3 sector exposures are Materials, Energy and Consumer Staples. In contrast, PHO's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Utilities. GNR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.59% for PHO. GNR is up 18.15% year-to-date (YTD) with +$274M in YTD flows. PHO performs worse with -2.69% YTD performance, and -$13M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GNR and PHO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GNR vs PHO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GNR PHO | -0.51%-6.81% | +19.46%-4.75% | +18.15%-2.69% | +45.01%+5.67% | +47.10%+36.29% | +69.47%+44.19% |
| Flows | GNR PHO | +$45M-$31K | +$351M-$14M | +$274M-$13M | +$812M-$197M | +$87M-$256M | +$1.83B-$7M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GNR PHO | +18.85%+15.44% | +16.90%+18.45% | +15.74%+16.22% | +18.19%+18.14% |
| Max drawdown | GNR PHO | -4.57%-8.11% | -14.74%-11.61% | -19.80%-19.26% | -25.18%-28.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | GNR PHO | 9d48d | 82d43d | 457d250d | 758d715d |
GNR | PHO | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:57 PM | $73.64 | $67.96 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $73.62 | $68.46 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GNR | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GNR | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $73.64 | $67.96 |
| 1D performance | +0.03% | -0.73% |
| AuM | $4.80 B | $2.02 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.59% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GNR and PHO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GNR is up 18.15% year-to-date (YTD), while PHO has lost -2.69%. That puts GNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GNR or PHO?
Year-to-date, the GNR ETF saw +$274M in flows, compared to -$13M for PHO.
Which ETF is more volatile: GNR or PHO?
Over the past year, GNR had a volatility of 16.9%, while PHO experienced 18.45%.
Which ETF is bigger: GNR or PHO?
As of March 11, 2026, GNR holds $4.80 B in assets under management (AUM), while PHO manages $2.02 B.
What sectors do the GNR and PHO ETFs invest in?
GNR leans toward sectors like Materials and Energy. Meanwhile, PHO focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Utilities.
What are the top holdings of the GNR ETF and PHO ETF?
GNR top holdings include NUTRIEN LTD, EXXON and BHP GROUP LTD. PHO holds in its top three: ECOLAB, US31488V1070 and WATERS.
Which ETF is more diversified: GNR or PHO?
GNR holds 89 securities with 45.62% of its assets in the top 15. PHO has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 76.33%.
3 Famous Investment Portfolios (And How to Make Them with ETFs)
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
3 Water ETFs for Thirsty Investors
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
