GNRvsPHOETF Comparison
ETF 1
GNR
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
This fund is part of
Natural Resources
-0.39%
VS
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. GNR's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, PHO's top sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Non-Energy Materials. GNR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.59% for PHO. GNR is up 15.92% year-to-date (YTD) with +$329M in YTD flows. PHO performs worse with -1.27% YTD performance, and -$74M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GNR and PHO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GNR vs PHO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GNR PHO | +6.13%+0.94% | -2.39%+0.05% | +15.92%-1.27% | +30.16%-1.75% | +38.04%+22.02% | +63.83%+27.24% |
| Flows | GNR PHO | -$29M-$15M | +$61M-$69M | +$329M-$74M | +$606M-$176M | +$359M-$299M | +$1.60B-$207M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GNR PHO | +14.74%+16.66% | +15.05%+15.69% | +15.13%+16.43% | +18.00%+18.30% |
| Max drawdown | GNR PHO | -10.55%-7.50% | -10.66%-13.83% | -19.80%-19.26% | -25.18%-28.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | GNR PHO | 75d59d | 147d279d | 457d250d | 758d715d |
Trading data
GNR | PHO | |
Last sale 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $71.41 | $71.49 |
| Previous close 07/27/2026 | $71.26 | $69.22 |
| Consolidated volume 07/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
GNR | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GNR | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $71.41 | $71.49 |
| 1D performance | +0.21% | +3.28% |
| AuM | $4.71 B | $1.98 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
GNR | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Natural Resources Index | NASDAQ OMX US Water Index |
| N° of holdings | 88 | 40 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 13, 2010 | December 6, 2005 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GNR
USA
34.78%
Canada
18.26%
United Kingdom
8.8%
Australia
8.29%
Other
29.87%
PHO
USA
94.59%
Other
5.41%
Sectors
GNR
Non-Energy Materi.
60.3%
Energy
32.77%
Other
6.93%
PHO
Industrials
46.17%
Healthcare
17.05%
Non-Energy Materi.
16.79%
Technology
12.53%
Utilities
7.45%
Advertisement
Diversification
GNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
44.9%
PHO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.4%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
GNR
BHP Group Ltd.
5.37%
Nutrien Ltd.
4.82%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
4.48%
Shell Plc
4.15%
Corteva, Inc.
3.27%
TotalEnergies SE
2.96%
UPM-Kymmene Oyj
2.93%
Newmont Corp.
2.67%
Chevron Corp.
2.44%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
2.37%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
2.11%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.04%
BP Plc
1.83%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
1.76%
Glencore Plc
1.70%
PHO
Ecolab, Inc.
8.49%
Roper Technologies, Inc.
7.96%
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
7.10%
Waters Corp.
6.76%
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
6.45%
Veralto Corp.
4.18%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
4.12%
Xylem, Inc.
4.07%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
3.84%
Pentair plc
3.73%
IDEX Corp.
3.66%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
3.21%
Jacobs Solutions, Inc.
3.16%
AECOM
2.97%
Core & Main, Inc.
2.72%
Frequently asked questions about GNR and PHO
How have the GNR and PHO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 27, 2026, GNR is up 15.92% year-to-date (YTD), while PHO has lost -1.27%. That puts GNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GNR or PHO?
Year-to-date, the GNR ETF saw +$329M in flows, compared to -$74M for PHO.
Which ETF is more volatile: GNR or PHO?
Over the past year, GNR had a volatility of 15.05%, while PHO experienced 15.69%.
Which ETF is bigger: GNR or PHO?
As of July 27, 2026, GNR holds $4.71 B in assets under management (AUM), while PHO manages $1.98 B.
What sectors do the GNR and PHO ETFs invest in?
GNR leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials and Energy. Meanwhile, PHO focuses on Industrials, Healthcare and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the GNR ETF and PHO ETF?
GNR top holdings include BHP Group Ltd., Nutrien Ltd. and Exxon Mobil Corp.. PHO holds in its top three: Ecolab, Inc., Roper Technologies, Inc. and Ferguson Enterprises, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: GNR or PHO?
GNR holds 88 securities with 44.9% of its assets in the top 15. PHO has 40 securities and a top 15 weight of 72.4%.
Advertisement
Latest news about GNR & PHO
3 Famous Investment Portfolios (And How to Make Them with ETFs)
February 8, 2024
GNR
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
PHO
3 Water ETFs for Thirsty Investors
February 3, 2023
PHO
Advertisement
Advertisement
