Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GNRvsMOOETF Comparison
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. GNR's top 3 sector exposures are Materials, Energy and Consumer Staples. In contrast, MOO's top sector exposures are Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials. GNR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.55% for MOO. GNR is up 18.63% year-to-date (YTD) with +$274M in YTD flows. MOO performs worse with 15.03% YTD performance, and +$299M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GNR and MOO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GNR vs MOO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GNR MOO | +1.58%-2.06% | +20.43%+15.35% | +18.63%+15.03% | +45.36%+25.31% | +47.69%+7.87% | +69.72%+6.97% |
| Flows | GNR MOO | +$32M+$44M | +$351M+$295M | +$274M+$299M | +$812M+$266M | +$87M-$224M | +$1.82B+$91M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GNR MOO | +18.80%+13.81% | +16.90%+15.71% | +15.73%+14.91% | +18.19%+16.35% |
| Max drawdown | GNR MOO | -4.57%-4.90% | -14.74%-12.71% | -19.80%-26.51% | -25.18%-39.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | GNR MOO | 10d20d | 82d43d | 457d1015d | 758d1421d |
GNR | MOO | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $72.43 | $83.54 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $73.65 | $84.76 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $72.43 | $83.54 |
| 1D performance | -1.66% | -1.44% |
| AuM | $4.82 B | $970.45 M |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.55% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GNR and MOO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, GNR is up 18.63% year-to-date (YTD), while MOO has returned 15.03%. That puts GNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GNR or MOO?
Year-to-date, the GNR ETF saw +$274M in flows, compared to +$299M for MOO.
Which ETF is more volatile: GNR or MOO?
Over the past year, GNR had a volatility of 16.9%, while MOO experienced 15.71%.
Which ETF is bigger: GNR or MOO?
As of March 12, 2026, GNR holds $4.82 B in assets under management (AUM), while MOO manages $970.45 M.
What sectors do the GNR and MOO ETFs invest in?
GNR leans toward sectors like Materials and Energy. Meanwhile, MOO focuses on Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the GNR ETF and MOO ETF?
GNR top holdings include NUTRIEN LTD, EXXON and BHP GROUP LTD. MOO holds in its top three: DEERE, BAYER AG and ZOETIS INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: GNR or MOO?
GNR holds 89 securities with 45.62% of its assets in the top 15. MOO has 47 securities and a top 15 weight of 70.5%.
3 Famous Investment Portfolios (And How to Make Them with ETFs)
Agricultural Commodity Futures ETFs vs Agricultural Equities ETFs
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
