GNRvsMOOETF Comparison
ETF 1
GNR
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
This fund is part of
Natural Resources
-0.27%
VS
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. GNR's top 3 sector exposures are Materials, Energy and Consumer Staples. In contrast, MOO's top sector exposures are Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials. GNR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.55% for MOO. GNR is up 19.35% year-to-date (YTD) with +$268M in YTD flows. MOO performs worse with 14.68% YTD performance, and +$492M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GNR and MOO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GNR vs MOO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 05/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GNR MOO | -0.47%-1.55% | +9.14%+3.50% | +19.35%+14.68% | +49.24%+23.89% | +46.15%+6.27% | +68.99%+2.23% |
| Flows | GNR MOO | -$82M+$52M | +$137M+$295M | +$268M+$492M | +$808M+$460M | +$79M+$12M | +$1.77B+$213M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GNR MOO | +17.66%+15.38% | +14.31%+13.18% | +15.41%+14.79% | +18.15%+16.42% |
| Max drawdown | GNR MOO | -7.23%-6.70% | -7.23%-8.31% | -19.80%-26.31% | -25.18%-39.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | GNR MOO | 60d71d | 60d134d | 457d915d | 758d1472d |
Trading data
GNR | MOO | |
Last sale 5/1/2026 at 1:30 PM | $74.16 | $83.38 |
| Previous close 04/29/2026 | $74.78 | $83.85 |
| Consolidated volume 04/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of April 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
GNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 5/1/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $74.16 | $83.38 |
| 1D performance | -0.83% | -0.56% |
| AuM | $4.85 B | $1.16 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.55% |
Characteristics
GNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | VanEck |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Natural Resources Index | MVIS Global Agribusiness Index |
| N° of holdings | 77 | 46 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 13, 2010 | August 31, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GNR
USA
37.82%
Canada
19.57%
United Kingdom
11%
Other
31.61%
MOO
USA
49.59%
Germany
8.79%
Norway
8%
Other
33.62%
Sectors
GNR
Materials
45.75%
Energy
35.14%
Other
19.11%
MOO
Consumer Staples
33.16%
Materials
25.92%
Industrials
19.18%
Health Care
17.03%
Other
4.7%
Advertisement
Diversification
GNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
47.1%
MOO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.32%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
GNR
EXXON
5.51%
SHELL PLC
5.30%
NUTRIEN LTD
5.22%
BHP GROUP LTD
3.97%
TOTALENERGIES SE
3.68%
CHEVRON TEXACO
3.02%
UPM-KYMMENE OY
2.89%
NEWMONT CORP
2.68%
CORTEVA INC
2.62%
BP
2.44%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
2.31%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
1.97%
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC
1.91%
US7594701077
1.91%
YARA INTL
1.68%
MOO
BAYER AG
7.77%
DEERE
7.53%
CORTEVA INC
6.90%
ZOETIS INC
6.85%
NUTRIEN LTD
5.83%
ARCHER DANIELS
5.61%
CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS
5.53%
TYSON FOODS
4.83%
CH1300646267
3.89%
KUBOTA
3.80%
MOWI ASA
3.09%
WILMAR INTERNATIONAL
3.09%
YARA INTL
2.88%
DARLING INGREDIENTS INC
2.54%
TORO
2.19%
Frequently asked questions about GNR and MOO
How have the GNR and MOO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of May 1, 2026, GNR is up 19.35% year-to-date (YTD), while MOO has returned 14.68%. That puts GNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GNR or MOO?
Year-to-date, the GNR ETF saw +$268M in flows, compared to +$492M for MOO.
Which ETF is more volatile: GNR or MOO?
Over the past year, GNR had a volatility of 14.31%, while MOO experienced 13.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: GNR or MOO?
As of May 1, 2026, GNR holds $4.85 B in assets under management (AUM), while MOO manages $1.16 B.
What sectors do the GNR and MOO ETFs invest in?
GNR leans toward sectors like Materials and Energy. Meanwhile, MOO focuses on Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the GNR ETF and MOO ETF?
GNR top holdings include EXXON, SHELL PLC and NUTRIEN LTD. MOO holds in its top three: BAYER AG, DEERE and CORTEVA INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: GNR or MOO?
GNR holds 89 securities with 47.1% of its assets in the top 15. MOO has 47 securities and a top 15 weight of 72.32%.
Advertisement
Latest news about GNR & MOO
3 Famous Investment Portfolios (And How to Make Them with ETFs)
February 8, 2024
GNR
Agricultural Commodity Futures ETFs vs Agricultural Equities ETFs
December 18, 2023
MOO
Advertisement
Advertisement
