GNRvsMOOETF Comparison
ETF 1
GNR
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
This fund is part of
Natural Resources
-0.05%
VS
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. GNR's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, MOO's top sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. GNR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.56% for MOO. GNR is up 16.7% year-to-date (YTD) with +$329M in YTD flows. MOO performs worse with 14.22% YTD performance, and +$327M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GNR and MOO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GNR vs MOO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GNR MOO | +6.73%+7.68% | -1.79%+1.05% | +16.70%+14.22% | +30.34%+13.49% | +39.93%+4.49% | +64.93%+2.46% |
| Flows | GNR MOO | -$29M+$20M | +$61M-$165M | +$329M+$327M | +$789M+$273M | +$387M-$71M | +$1.60B+$129M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GNR MOO | +14.69%+13.38% | +15.02%+13.40% | +15.14%+14.58% | +17.99%+16.46% |
| Max drawdown | GNR MOO | -10.55%-9.34% | -10.66%-10.98% | -19.80%-26.31% | -25.18%-39.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | GNR MOO | 72d80d | 144d155d | 457d915d | 758d1556d |
Trading data
GNR | MOO | |
Last sale 7/27/2026 at 3:17 PM | $71.20 | $82.76 |
| Previous close 07/24/2026 | $71.78 | $83.15 |
| Consolidated volume 07/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
GNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/27/2026 at 3:17 PM
Live
Closed
GNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $71.20 | $82.76 |
| 1D performance | -0.81% | -0.47% |
| AuM | $4.74 B | $988.49 M |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.56% |
Characteristics
GNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | VanEck |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Natural Resources Index | MVIS Global Agribusiness Index |
| N° of holdings | 88 | 46 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 13, 2010 | August 31, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GNR
USA
34.78%
Canada
18.26%
United Kingdom
8.8%
Australia
8.29%
Other
29.87%
MOO
USA
52.47%
Germany
9.66%
Other
37.87%
Sectors
GNR
Non-Energy Materi.
60.3%
Energy
32.77%
Other
6.93%
MOO
Consumer Non-Cycl.
33.56%
Non-Energy Materi.
27.89%
Industrials
22.41%
Healthcare
16.13%
Other
0%
Advertisement
Diversification
GNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
44.9%
MOO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.43%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
GNR
BHP Group Ltd.
5.37%
Nutrien Ltd.
4.82%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
4.48%
Shell Plc
4.15%
Corteva, Inc.
3.27%
TotalEnergies SE
2.96%
UPM-Kymmene Oyj
2.93%
Newmont Corp.
2.67%
Chevron Corp.
2.44%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
2.37%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
2.11%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.04%
BP Plc
1.83%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
1.76%
Glencore Plc
1.70%
MOO
Bayer AG
8.82%
Deere & Co.
8.78%
Corteva, Inc.
8.78%
Nutrien Ltd.
5.99%
Zoetis, Inc.
5.30%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
5.10%
Kubota Corp.
4.76%
Tyson Foods, Inc.
4.46%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
4.25%
Bunge Global SA
3.44%
Mowi ASA
2.84%
CNH Industrial NV
2.61%
Wilmar International Ltd.
2.49%
The Toro Co.
2.45%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
2.37%
Frequently asked questions about GNR and MOO
How have the GNR and MOO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, GNR is up 16.7% year-to-date (YTD), while MOO has returned 14.22%. That puts GNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GNR or MOO?
Year-to-date, the GNR ETF saw +$329M in flows, compared to +$327M for MOO.
Which ETF is more volatile: GNR or MOO?
Over the past year, GNR had a volatility of 15.02%, while MOO experienced 13.4%.
Which ETF is bigger: GNR or MOO?
As of July 24, 2026, GNR holds $4.74 B in assets under management (AUM), while MOO manages $988.49 M.
What sectors do the GNR and MOO ETFs invest in?
GNR leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials and Energy. Meanwhile, MOO focuses on Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the GNR ETF and MOO ETF?
GNR top holdings include BHP Group Ltd., Nutrien Ltd. and Exxon Mobil Corp.. MOO holds in its top three: Bayer AG, Deere & Co. and Corteva, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: GNR or MOO?
GNR holds 88 securities with 44.9% of its assets in the top 15. MOO has 46 securities and a top 15 weight of 72.43%.
Advertisement
Latest news about GNR & MOO
3 Famous Investment Portfolios (And How to Make Them with ETFs)
February 8, 2024
GNR
Agricultural Commodity Futures ETFs vs Agricultural Equities ETFs
December 18, 2023
MOO
Advertisement
Advertisement
