GNRvsCSNRETF Comparison
ETF 1
GNR
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
This fund is part of
Natural Resources
-0.39%
VS
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. GNR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.7% for CSNR. GNR is up 16.7% year-to-date (YTD) with +$329M in YTD flows. CSNR performs worse with 15.45% YTD performance, and +$40M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GNR and CSNR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GNR vs CSNR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GNR CSNR | +6.73%+5.04% | -1.79%-4.28% | +16.70%+15.45% | +30.34%+32.92% | +39.93%n/a | +64.93%n/a |
| Flows | GNR CSNR | -$29M+$0K | +$61M+$4M | +$329M+$40M | +$789M+$48M | +$387M- | +$1.60B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GNR CSNR | +14.69%+16.15% | +15.02%+16.52% | +15.14%n/a | +17.99%n/a |
| Max drawdown | GNR CSNR | -10.55%-11.25% | -10.66%-12.00% | -19.80%n/a | -25.18%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GNR CSNR | 72d75d | 144d105d | 457dn/a | 758dn/a |
Trading data
GNR | CSNR | |
Last sale 7/28/2026 at 3:54 PM | $71.54 | $35.00 |
| Previous close 07/24/2026 | $71.26 | $35.25 |
| Consolidated volume 07/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CSNR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexGNR | CSNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/28/2026 at 3:54 PM
Live
Closed
GNR | CSNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $71.54 | $35.00 |
| 1D performance | +0.39% | -0.70% |
| AuM | $4.74 B | $95.86 M |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.7% |
Characteristics
GNR | CSNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | Cohen & Steers |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Natural Resources Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 88 | 57 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 13, 2010 | February 6, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GNR
USA
34.78%
Canada
18.26%
United Kingdom
8.8%
Australia
8.29%
Other
29.87%
CSNR
USA
37.54%
Canada
20.01%
United Kingdom
7.46%
Other
34.99%
Sectors
GNR
Non-Energy Materi.
60.3%
Energy
32.77%
Other
6.93%
CSNR
Non-Energy Materi.
37.17%
Energy
35.04%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
15.23%
Other
12.55%
Advertisement
Diversification
GNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
44.9%
CSNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
48.28%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
GNR
BHP Group Ltd.
5.37%
Nutrien Ltd.
4.82%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
4.48%
Shell Plc
4.15%
Corteva, Inc.
3.27%
TotalEnergies SE
2.96%
UPM-Kymmene Oyj
2.93%
Newmont Corp.
2.67%
Chevron Corp.
2.44%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
2.37%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
2.11%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.04%
BP Plc
1.83%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
1.76%
Glencore Plc
1.70%
CSNR
US30233Q1085
5.67%
Bunge Global SA
4.42%
TotalEnergies SE
3.79%
Nutrien Ltd.
3.47%
Shell Plc
3.18%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
3.09%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
3.06%
Glencore Plc
3.04%
Corteva, Inc.
2.88%
Franco-Nevada Corp.
2.81%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
2.68%
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
2.66%
Newmont Corp.
2.64%
Mowi ASA
2.58%
Anglo American Plc
2.32%
Frequently asked questions about GNR and CSNR
How have the GNR and CSNR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, GNR is up 16.7% year-to-date (YTD), while CSNR has returned 15.45%. That puts GNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GNR or CSNR?
Year-to-date, the GNR ETF saw +$329M in flows, compared to +$40M for CSNR.
Which ETF is more volatile: GNR or CSNR?
Over the past year, GNR had a volatility of 15.02%, while CSNR experienced 16.52%.
Which ETF is bigger: GNR or CSNR?
As of July 24, 2026, GNR holds $4.74 B in assets under management (AUM), while CSNR manages $95.86 M.
What sectors do the GNR and CSNR ETFs invest in?
GNR leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials and Energy. Meanwhile, CSNR focuses on Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the GNR ETF and CSNR ETF?
GNR top holdings include BHP Group Ltd., Nutrien Ltd. and Exxon Mobil Corp.. CSNR holds in its top three: US30233Q1085, Bunge Global SA and TotalEnergies SE.
Which ETF is more diversified: GNR or CSNR?
GNR holds 88 securities with 44.9% of its assets in the top 15. CSNR has 59 securities and a top 15 weight of 48.28%.
Advertisement
Latest news about GNR & CSNR
Cohen & Steers Enters the ETF World with Triple Launch
February 10, 2025
CSNR
3 Famous Investment Portfolios (And How to Make Them with ETFs)
February 8, 2024
GNR
Advertisement
Advertisement
