GJANvsJEPQETF Comparison
FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January
FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January (GJAN) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. GJAN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.35% for JEPQ. GJAN is up 8.3% year-to-date (YTD) with +$69M in YTD flows. JEPQ performs better with 10.72% YTD performance, and +$10.33B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GJAN and JEPQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GJAN vs JEPQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GJAN JEPQ | +1.30%+0.51% | +2.36%+2.60% | +8.30%+10.72% | +11.34%+15.71% | +41.80%+71.07% | n/an/a |
| Flows | GJAN JEPQ | -$1M+$1.45B | -$8M+$3.86B | +$69M+$10.33B | +$42M+$11.72B | +$200M+$33.68B | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GJAN JEPQ | +3.90%+13.96% | +5.61%+14.95% | +7.31%+15.77% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | GJAN JEPQ | -1.07%-5.97% | -4.59%-8.85% | -10.30%-20.17% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GJAN JEPQ | 16d13d | 44d76d | 110d169d | n/an/a |
GJAN | JEPQ | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.20 | $58.81 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $46.41 | $60.10 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
GJAN | JEPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.20 | $58.81 |
| 1D performance | -0.44% | -2.15% |
| AuM | $441.81 M | $43.34 B |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.35% |
GJAN | JEPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Vest | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 20, 2023 | May 3, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
