Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GIIvsMLPAETF Comparison
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. GII's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, MLPA's top sector exposures are Energy, Utilities GII is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.45% for MLPA. GII is up 8.6% year-to-date (YTD) with +$61M in YTD flows. MLPA performs better with 13.52% YTD performance, and +$73M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GII and MLPA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GII vs MLPA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GII MLPA | -0.81%+3.39% | +9.27%+12.66% | +8.60%+13.52% | +30.68%+12.43% | +58.57%+62.55% | +72.93%+130.24% |
| Flows | GII MLPA | +$54M+$16M | +$82M+$115M | +$61M+$73M | +$178M+$244M | +$57M+$374M | +$183M+$682M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GII MLPA | +9.51%+10.97% | +11.10%+15.79% | +11.12%+13.85% | +12.12%+18.44% |
| Max drawdown | GII MLPA | -3.83%-1.74% | -8.02%-14.09% | -14.95%-14.09% | -20.58%-18.70% |
| Max drawdown duration | GII MLPA | 10d5d | 18d299d | 322d299d | 747d77d |
GII | MLPA | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $75.65 | $53.41 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $75.87 | $53.90 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GII | MLPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GII | MLPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $75.65 | $53.41 |
| 1D performance | -0.30% | -0.91% |
| AuM | $799.95 M | $2.14 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.45% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GII and MLPA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GII is up 8.6% year-to-date (YTD), while MLPA has returned 13.52%. That puts MLPA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GII or MLPA?
Year-to-date, the GII ETF saw +$61M in flows, compared to +$73M for MLPA.
Which ETF is more volatile: GII or MLPA?
Over the past year, GII had a volatility of 11.1%, while MLPA experienced 15.79%.
Which ETF is bigger: GII or MLPA?
As of March 11, 2026, GII holds $799.95 M in assets under management (AUM), while MLPA manages $2.14 B.
What sectors do the GII and MLPA ETFs invest in?
GII leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, MLPA focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the GII ETF and MLPA ETF?
GII top holdings include ES0105046017, NEXTERA ENERGY and TRANSURBAN GRP REIT. MLPA holds in its top three: ENERGY TRANSFER LP UNITS, ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS UNT and MPLX COMMON UNITS.
Which ETF is more diversified: GII or MLPA?
GII holds 76 securities with 50.43% of its assets in the top 15. MLPA has 20 securities and a top 15 weight of 107.18%.
Three Ways You Can Get Higher Income with ETFs
Resilience in Energy Infrastructure Funds Amidst Last Week’s Market Decline
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
