Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GGUSvsJGROETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) and JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. GGUS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.44% for JGRO. GGUS is down -3.56% year-to-date (YTD) with +$21M in YTD flows. JGRO performs worse with -5.04% YTD performance, and +$379M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GGUS and JGRO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GGUS vs JGRO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GGUS JGRO | -1.64%-2.23% | -4.16%-6.99% | -3.56%-5.04% | +24.18%+19.64% | n/a+96.13% | n/an/a |
| Flows | GGUS JGRO | +$25M+$187M | +$25M+$506M | +$21M+$379M | +$83M+$2.90B | -+$7.11B | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GGUS JGRO | +14.94%+15.35% | +21.89%+21.74% | n/a+19.21% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | GGUS JGRO | -6.66%-8.33% | -15.24%-15.30% | n/a-22.81% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GGUS JGRO | 74d90d | 45d45d | n/a154d | n/an/a |
GGUS | JGRO | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $61.20 | $88.08 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $61.23 | $88.11 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GGUS | JGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GGUS | JGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $61.20 | $88.08 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | -0.03% |
| AuM | $405.04 M | $8.46 B |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.44% |
GGUS | JGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Russell 1000 Growth 40 Act Daily Capped Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 349 | 99 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 29, 2023 | August 8, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GGUS and JGRO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, GGUS is down -3.56% year-to-date (YTD), while JGRO has lost -5.04%. That puts GGUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GGUS or JGRO?
Year-to-date, the GGUS ETF saw +$21M in flows, compared to +$379M for JGRO.
Which ETF is more volatile: GGUS or JGRO?
Over the past year, GGUS had a volatility of 21.89%, while JGRO experienced 21.74%.
Which ETF is bigger: GGUS or JGRO?
As of March 9, 2026, GGUS holds $405.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while JGRO manages $8.46 B.
What sectors do the GGUS and JGRO ETFs invest in?
GGUS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, JGRO focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the GGUS ETF and JGRO ETF?
GGUS top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. JGRO holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: GGUS or JGRO?
GGUS holds 388 securities with 58.61% of its assets in the top 15. JGRO has 107 securities and a top 15 weight of 61.09%.
Equity Investing 101: Understanding U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFs
U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFs to Watch
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
