GGRWvsSCHGETF Comparison
VS
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. GGRW's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. In contrast, SCHG's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. GGRW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.9%, versus 0.04% for SCHG. GGRW is up 4.33% year-to-date (YTD) with -$396K in YTD flows. SCHG performs better with 8.32% YTD performance, and +$5.64B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GGRW and SCHG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GGRW vs SCHG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GGRW SCHG | +1.34%+0.82% | -1.98%+1.75% | +4.33%+8.32% | +5.48%+11.37% | +93.88%+88.99% | +35.37%+84.98% |
| Flows | GGRW SCHG | -+$555M | -$369K+$1.39B | -$396K+$5.64B | -$38K+$6.30B | +$2M+$20.62B | +$2M+$24.02B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GGRW SCHG | +15.74%+14.85% | +16.92%+16.64% | +19.11%+19.71% | +25.44%+22.65% |
| Max drawdown | GGRW SCHG | -6.38%-4.68% | -13.16%-16.35% | -20.31%-23.41% | -50.31%-34.60% |
| Max drawdown duration | GGRW SCHG | 64d10d | 174d188d | 151d193d | 1057d754d |
Trading data
GGRW | SCHG | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.03 | $35.58 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $36.76 | $35.21 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
GGRW
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexGGRW | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GGRW | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.03 | $35.58 |
| 1D performance | +0.75% | +1.05% |
| AuM | $8.09 M | $63.04 B |
| E/R | 0.9% | 0.04% |
Characteristics
GGRW | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Gabelli Funds | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| N° of holdings | 41 | 187 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 16, 2021 | December 11, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GGRW
USA
91.81%
Other
8.19%
SCHG
USA
98.24%
Other
1.76%
Sectors
GGRW
Technology
53.06%
Industrials
14.78%
Finance
8.8%
Healthcare
8.16%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.18%
Other
8.02%
SCHG
Technology
56.16%
Healthcare
9.96%
Finance
8.13%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.23%
Other
18.52%
Advertisement
Diversification
GGRW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
63.56%
SCHG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
61.95%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
GGRW
NVIDIA Corp.
9.39%
Amazon.com, Inc.
6.12%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.06%
Microsoft Corp.
4.42%
Eli Lilly & Co.
4.20%
Broadcom Inc.
3.98%
Apple, Inc.
3.61%
GE Vernova, Inc.
3.60%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.57%
Applied Materials, Inc.
3.48%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.42%
GE Aerospace
3.34%
Amphenol Corp.
3.10%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
2.73%
ASML Holding NV
2.55%
SCHG
NVIDIA Corp.
10.61%
Apple, Inc.
9.36%
Microsoft Corp.
7.51%
Amazon.com, Inc.
5.26%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.18%
Broadcom Inc.
3.47%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.34%
Eli Lilly & Co.
3.21%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.57%
Visa, Inc.
2.51%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.47%
Tesla, Inc.
2.31%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.91%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
1.67%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
1.57%
Frequently asked questions about GGRW and SCHG
How have the GGRW and SCHG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, GGRW is up 4.33% year-to-date (YTD), while SCHG has returned 8.32%. That puts SCHG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GGRW or SCHG?
Year-to-date, the GGRW ETF saw -$396K in flows, compared to +$5.64B for SCHG.
Which ETF is more volatile: GGRW or SCHG?
Over the past year, GGRW had a volatility of 16.92%, while SCHG experienced 16.64%.
Which ETF is bigger: GGRW or SCHG?
As of October 16, 2026, GGRW holds $8.09 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCHG manages $63.04 B.
What sectors do the GGRW and SCHG ETFs invest in?
GGRW leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, SCHG focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the GGRW ETF and SCHG ETF?
GGRW top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Amazon.com, Inc. and Alphabet, Inc.. SCHG holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: GGRW or SCHG?
GGRW holds 41 securities with 63.56% of its assets in the top 15. SCHG has 188 securities and a top 15 weight of 61.95%.
Advertisement
Latest news about GGRW & SCHG
Advertisement
Advertisement
