Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GDOCvsHRTSETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) belongs to the Healthcare Technology segment. Tema GLP-1, Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) is part of the Tomorrow's Treatments segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Health Care. GDOC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.99% for HRTS. GDOC is down -6.72% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. HRTS performs better with -4.67% YTD performance, and -$713K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GDOC and HRTS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GDOC vs HRTS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GDOC HRTS | -3.58%-5.84% | -6.96%-4.63% | -6.72%-4.67% | +3.86%+15.66% | +8.93%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | GDOC HRTS | +$2M-$2M | +$2M+$712K | +$2M-$713K | +$920K-$17M | -$77M- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GDOC HRTS | +13.36%+14.54% | +16.34%+17.68% | +14.12%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | GDOC HRTS | -9.98%-7.89% | -12.55%-13.50% | -22.18%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GDOC HRTS | 63d65d | 192d163d | 449dn/a | n/an/a |
GDOC | HRTS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.41 | $33.67 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $32.59 | $33.85 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
GDOC | HRTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.41 | $33.67 |
| 1D performance | -0.55% | -0.54% |
| AuM | $21.60 M | $51.53 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.99% |
GDOC | HRTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | Tema |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 35 | 39 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 11, 2021 | November 21, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GDOC and HRTS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GDOC is down -6.72% year-to-date (YTD), while HRTS has lost -4.67%. That puts HRTS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GDOC or HRTS?
Year-to-date, the GDOC ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to -$713K for HRTS.
Which ETF is more volatile: GDOC or HRTS?
Over the past year, GDOC had a volatility of 16.34%, while HRTS experienced 17.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: GDOC or HRTS?
As of March 11, 2026, GDOC holds $21.60 M in assets under management (AUM), while HRTS manages $51.53 M.
What sectors do the GDOC and HRTS ETFs invest in?
GDOC leans toward sectors like Health Care. Meanwhile, HRTS focuses on Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the GDOC ETF and HRTS ETF?
GDOC top holdings include LILLY, JOHNSON&JOHNSON and BOSTON SCIENTIFIC. HRTS holds in its top three: LILLY, US7711951043 and JOHNSON&JOHNSON.
Which ETF is more diversified: GDOC or HRTS?
GDOC holds 39 securities with 69.61% of its assets in the top 15. HRTS has 44 securities and a top 15 weight of 61.09%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
