GDMAvsCSHIETF Comparison
VS
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) and NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. GDMA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.38% for CSHI. GDMA is up 4.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. CSHI performs worse with 3.83% YTD performance, and +$1.23B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GDMA and CSHI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GDMA vs CSHI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GDMA CSHI | -2.38%+0.36% | -3.08%+1.06% | +4.81%+3.83% | +5.86%+4.97% | +45.64%+16.74% | +42.39%n/a |
| Flows | GDMA CSHI | +$3M+$186M | -$9M+$570M | +$5M+$1.23B | +$28M+$1.36B | -$4M+$1.84B | +$38M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GDMA CSHI | +9.63%+0.23% | +14.91%+0.53% | +11.45%+1.10% | +10.06%n/a |
| Max drawdown | GDMA CSHI | -6.96%n/a | -8.47%-0.18% | -8.47%-1.52% | -12.39%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GDMA CSHI | 60dn/a | 116d6d | 116d20d | 813dn/a |
Trading data
GDMA | CSHI | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $40.40 | $49.59 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $40.47 | $49.60 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GDMA | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $40.40 | $49.59 |
| 1D performance | -0.17% | -0.02% |
| AuM | $192.23 M | $2.03 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
GDMA | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Gadsen | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 14, 2018 | August 30, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GDMA
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
GDMA
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
GDMA
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
GDMA
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about GDMA and CSHI
How have the GDMA and CSHI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, GDMA is up 4.81% year-to-date (YTD), while CSHI has returned 3.83%. That puts GDMA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GDMA or CSHI?
Year-to-date, the GDMA ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$1.23B for CSHI.
Which ETF is more volatile: GDMA or CSHI?
Over the past year, GDMA had a volatility of 14.91%, while CSHI experienced 0.53%.
Which ETF is bigger: GDMA or CSHI?
As of October 16, 2026, GDMA holds $192.23 M in assets under management (AUM), while CSHI manages $2.03 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about GDMA & CSHI
Advertisement
Advertisement
