Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FYCvsXSHQETF Comparison
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund ETF (FYC) belongs to the US Small Cap Growth segment. Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. FYC's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, XSHQ's top sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. FYC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.29% for XSHQ. FYC is down -0.66% year-to-date (YTD) with +$137M in YTD flows. XSHQ performs worse with -0.98% YTD performance, and -$13M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FYC and XSHQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FYC vs XSHQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FYC XSHQ | -4.19%-6.95% | -2.91%-3.61% | -0.66%-0.98% | +37.42%+12.23% | +74.17%+31.80% | +31.44%+16.00% |
| Flows | FYC XSHQ | -$5M-$5M | +$161M-$16M | +$137M-$13M | +$295M-$218M | +$481M+$204M | +$310M+$196M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FYC XSHQ | +19.67%+16.24% | +24.11%+21.73% | +21.67%+20.21% | +24.04%+21.19% |
| Max drawdown | FYC XSHQ | -7.99%-8.19% | -16.36%-13.47% | -27.69%-27.13% | -35.34%-27.13% |
| Max drawdown duration | FYC XSHQ | 49d32d | 46d37d | 251d473d | 1093d473d |
FYC | XSHQ | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $95.15 | $41.74 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $95.48 | $41.63 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FYC | XSHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FYC | XSHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $95.15 | $41.74 |
| 1D performance | -0.35% | +0.26% |
| AuM | $868.43 M | $231.83 M |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.29% |
FYC | XSHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Invesco |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index | S&P SmallCap 600 Quality Index |
| N° of holdings | 228 | 118 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 19, 2011 | April 6, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FYC and XSHQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, FYC is down -0.66% year-to-date (YTD), while XSHQ has lost -0.98%. That puts FYC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FYC or XSHQ?
Year-to-date, the FYC ETF saw +$137M in flows, compared to -$13M for XSHQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: FYC or XSHQ?
Over the past year, FYC had a volatility of 24.11%, while XSHQ experienced 21.73%.
Which ETF is bigger: FYC or XSHQ?
As of March 12, 2026, FYC holds $868.43 M in assets under management (AUM), while XSHQ manages $231.83 M.
What sectors do the FYC and XSHQ ETFs invest in?
FYC leans toward sectors like Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, XSHQ focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the FYC ETF and XSHQ ETF?
FYC top holdings include ACM RESEARCH, VICOR and ASTRONICS. XSHQ holds in its top three: INTERDIGITAL, BRINKER INTERNATIONAL and ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES.
Which ETF is more diversified: FYC or XSHQ?
FYC holds 262 securities with 11.96% of its assets in the top 15. XSHQ has 120 securities and a top 15 weight of 29.93%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
