FXIvsKWEBETF Comparison
VS
iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) belongs to the China Blended Cap segment. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) is part of the EM Awakening segment. FXI's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. In contrast, KWEB's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Real Estate. FXI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.73%, versus 0.7% for KWEB. FXI is down -5.22% year-to-date (YTD) with -$370M in YTD flows. KWEB performs worse with -16.73% YTD performance, and +$14M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FXI and KWEB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FXI vs KWEB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FXI KWEB | -0.64%-0.38% | -1.22%-6.43% | -5.22%-16.73% | +5.56%-8.80% | +43.18%+18.37% | -13.54%-52.46% |
| Flows | FXI KWEB | -$311M+$254M | -$370M+$370M | -$370M+$14M | -$484M+$1.71B | -$365M+$2.55B | +$2.72B+$9.41B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FXI KWEB | +20.45%+26.05% | +18.93%+23.25% | +25.88%+30.27% | +29.74%+40.79% |
| Max drawdown | FXI KWEB | -8.39%-13.94% | -15.40%-34.63% | -28.82%-34.63% | -55.04%-72.33% |
| Max drawdown duration | FXI KWEB | 20d84d | 243d243d | 420d243d | 1800d1826d |
Trading data
FXI | KWEB | |
Last sale 6/3/2026 at 7:49 PM | $35.58 | $27.25 |
| Previous close 06/02/2026 | $36.36 | $28.33 |
| Consolidated volume 06/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FXI | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/3/2026 at 7:49 PM
Live
Closed
FXI | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.58 | $27.25 |
| 1D performance | -2.16% | -3.83% |
| AuM | $5.70 B | $6.60 B |
| E/R | 0.73% | 0.7% |
Characteristics
FXI | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | KraneShares |
| Benchmark | FTSE China 50 Index | CSI Overseas China Internet Index |
| N° of holdings | 45 | 24 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 5, 2004 | July 31, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FXI
China
53.67%
Cayman Islands
44.05%
Other
2.28%
KWEB
Cayman Islands
69.53%
USA
26.66%
Other
3.81%
Sectors
FXI
Financials
34.69%
Consumer Discreti.
25.88%
Communication Ser.
15.27%
Other
24.16%
KWEB
Consumer Discreti.
43.68%
Communication Ser.
34.66%
Other
21.66%
Advertisement
Diversification
FXI
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.03%
KWEB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
79.24%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
FXI
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
8.56%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK
8.30%
TENCENT HOLDINGS
7.69%
INDUSTRIAL COMMERC BK CHINA
6.07%
XIAOMI CORP
5.41%
MEITUAN
4.79%
PING AN
4.42%
BYD
4.08%
BANK OF CHINA
3.75%
NETEASE INC
3.52%
JD.COM INC
2.98%
BAIDU
2.75%
PETROCHINA
2.71%
TRIP.COM GROUP
2.69%
ZIJIN MINING
2.30%
KWEB
TENCENT HOLDINGS
9.62%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
9.33%
PINDUODUO INC ADR
8.58%
MEITUAN
7.28%
NETEASE INC
6.12%
JD.COM INC
4.98%
KE HOLDINGS
4.78%
BAIDU
4.74%
TRIP.COM GROUP
3.85%
JD HEALTH INTERNATIONAL
3.81%
US35969L1089
3.69%
US8740801043
3.32%
KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY
3.12%
BILIBILI
3.08%
US48553T1060
2.94%
Frequently asked questions about FXI and KWEB
How have the FXI and KWEB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 2, 2026, FXI is down -5.22% year-to-date (YTD), while KWEB has lost -16.73%. That puts FXI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FXI or KWEB?
Year-to-date, the FXI ETF saw -$370M in flows, compared to +$14M for KWEB.
Which ETF is more volatile: FXI or KWEB?
Over the past year, FXI had a volatility of 18.93%, while KWEB experienced 23.25%.
Which ETF is bigger: FXI or KWEB?
As of June 2, 2026, FXI holds $5.70 B in assets under management (AUM), while KWEB manages $6.60 B.
What sectors do the FXI and KWEB ETFs invest in?
FXI leans toward sectors like Financials, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, KWEB focuses on Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the FXI ETF and KWEB ETF?
FXI top holdings include ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD, CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK and TENCENT HOLDINGS. KWEB holds in its top three: TENCENT HOLDINGS, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD and PINDUODUO INC ADR.
Which ETF is more diversified: FXI or KWEB?
FXI holds 51 securities with 70.03% of its assets in the top 15. KWEB has 31 securities and a top 15 weight of 79.24%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FXI & KWEB
U.S. ETFs Arrive on ADX, Connecting Abu Dhabi and New York Markets
December 18, 2025
KWEB
Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch
January 23, 2025
KWEB
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
October 4, 2024
FXI
KWEB
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in China's Comeback
May 31, 2024
FXI
KWEB
Advertisement
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
KWEB
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
KWEB
Generate Income With This China Internet Covered Call ETF
February 14, 2023
KWEB
Growth Potential of China ETFs
January 30, 2023
KWEB
Advertisement
