Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FTXGvsGXPSETF Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) belong to the same industry segment: US Cons. Staples. FTXG's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Staples and Materials. In contrast, GXPS's top sector exposures are Consumer Staples and Consumer Discretionary. FTXG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.25% for GXPS. FTXG is up 7.23% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1M in YTD flows. GXPS performs better with 10.65% YTD performance, and +$13M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FTXG and GXPS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FTXG vs GXPS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTXG GXPS | -5.08%-4.43% | +4.29%+8.83% | +7.23%+10.65% | +0.19%n/a | -4.51%n/a | -1.86%n/a |
| Flows | FTXG GXPS | -+$5M | +$1M+$16M | +$1M+$13M | -$4M- | -$946M- | +$138M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FTXG GXPS | +14.79%+14.41% | +15.20%n/a | +13.63%n/a | +14.28%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FTXG GXPS | -6.29%-5.52% | -12.33%n/a | -20.04%n/a | -21.63%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FTXG GXPS | 11d12d | 308dn/a | 1040dn/a | 1422dn/a |
FTXG | GXPS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $22.54 | $26.97 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $22.44 | $26.78 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FTXG | GXPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FTXG | GXPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.54 | $26.97 |
| 1D performance | +0.43% | +0.72% |
| AuM | $19.08 M | $47.96 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.25% |
FTXG | GXPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Global X |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ US Smart Food & Beverage Index | MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index |
| N° of holdings | 30 | 35 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | July 23, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FTXG and GXPS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, FTXG is up 7.23% year-to-date (YTD), while GXPS has returned 10.65%. That puts GXPS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FTXG or GXPS?
Year-to-date, the FTXG ETF saw +$1M in flows, compared to +$13M for GXPS.
Which ETF is bigger: FTXG or GXPS?
As of March 12, 2026, FTXG holds $19.08 M in assets under management (AUM), while GXPS manages $47.96 M.
What sectors do the FTXG and GXPS ETFs invest in?
FTXG leans toward sectors like Consumer Staples. Meanwhile, GXPS focuses on Consumer Staples.
What are the top holdings of the FTXG ETF and GXPS ETF?
FTXG top holdings include ARCHER DANIELS, PEPSICO U and MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL INC. GXPS holds in its top three: WALMART INC, COSTCO WHOLESALE and PROCTERGAMBLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: FTXG or GXPS?
FTXG holds 30 securities with 76.31% of its assets in the top 15. GXPS has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 87.82%.
ETF Industry KPI – 4/17/2023
3 food and beverage ETFs for hungry investors
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
